Pogromul si Fața nevăzută a violonistului Alexandru Tomescu-

Publicat în 19 februarie 2014 de gicacontra, un articol despre abuzuri ce sunt comise pana in prezent 2017

Pogromul si Fața nevăzută a violonistului Alexandru Tomescu-

for english version click here

Dacă in vremurile de trista amintire evreii erau exterminati pe muzică de Wagner, o familie de evrei in care exista si o victima holocaustului din Romania este evacuată forțat pe muzica de Bach! de catre violonistul Alexandru Tomescu.
alexandru tomescu str. grigore cobalcescu nr 13 Bucuresti
Iancu Jeny – str. Grigore Cobalcescu nr 13 Bucuresti – Alexandru Tomescu

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu incepe prin a spune ca mama mea Iancu Jeny incearca sa locuiasca in casa mult ravnita fara nici un fel de drept legal de numitul Tomescu Alexandru.

Doamna Iancu Jeny victima holocaustului, membra AERVH (Asociatia Evreilor din Romania Victime ale Holocasutului) nu este la prima intamplare trista de acest gen statul roman trimitand aceasta familie in strada si in anii 40 pentru simplul fapt ca erau evrei.

Iancu Jeny
Iancu Jeny

Cazul doamnei Iancu Jeny a fost subiectul unei anchete pe prima pagina a ziarul Evenimentul Zilei din 17.09.2018

click, pentru varianta online:

https://evz.ro/violonistul-stradivarius-canta-fals.html

varianta tiparita:

Emisiunea ” Vama Verde ” ( Partea I ), difuzată în data de 2 Iulie 2017 pe postul naţional de televiziune ” Nasul TV “!
Victima Sistemului Mafiot, domnul Nicolae Moldoveanu, alături de avocatii Adrian Cuculis şi Mădălin Penciu.

Astazi cu toate ca statul Roman a recunoscut aceasta trista perioada, exista persoane care ignora cu buna stiinta acest lucru si se dedau la fapte grave beneficiand de suportul unei grupari infractionale din care fac parte organe de politie, procurori, judecatori, executori, notari, banci, numitul Tomescu Alexandru, casa de avocatura Stoica si Asociatii si nu in ultimul rand adjunctul SIE generalul Dan Chiriac care comanda din umbra acest serial prin interpusi.

Dar sa revin la obiectul articolului.

Apartamentul este parte a unei frumoase vile situată vis-a-vis de Parcul Cișmigiu, parte din vila fiind proprietatea noastra de 2 camere la etaj, cealaltă jumătate aparținând pana in anul 2011 unei familii care a obtinut-o in urma unei revendicari.

grigore cobalcescu nr 13
str profesor Grigore Cobalcescu nr 13 sector 1 Bucuresti

Ulterior, această parte de vila a fost cumpărată in anul 2011 de numitul Alexandru Tomescu cu suma de 100.000 Euro, si cu alți 50.000 de Euro Alexandru Tomescu cumpăra și dreptul de a solicita despăgubiri de la stat respectiv A.N.R.P. (Autoritatea Naţională pentru Restituirea Proprietăţilor) Din cate am cunostinta acesta a cumparat aceasta parte de vila fara sa o vada.

Se pune intrebarea desigur cine cumpara o parte dintr-o vila de 100.000 Euro fara sa o vada? Cine da alti 50.000 euro pentru a primii despagubiri de la A.N.R.P.(Autoritatea Naţională pentru Restituirea Proprietăţilor)  fara sa aiba “terenul pregatit” si sa aiba siguranta ca in final va face ce isi doreste. In randurile urmatoare va voi oferii aceste raspunsuri.

De retinut ca Tomescu Alexandru nu face nici un demers pentru a obtine despagubirile de la A.N.R.P. (Autoritatea Naţională pentru Restituirea Proprietăţilor) asa cum are dreptul prin contract in schimb decide sa obtina aceste despagubiri de la familia noastra.

Astfel incepe in mod direct si prin interpusi o intreaga operatiune de teroare din care nu lipsesc activitati precum: oprirea utilitatilor prin manopere ilegale in complicitate cu Apa Nova s.a, GDF Suez, lucrari de constructie ilegale fara nici un fel de autorizatie prin care distrug in mod intentionat acoperisul casei noastre in plina iarna, distrugere, plangeri la politie solutionate cu N.U.P. ( Neinceperea Urmarii Penale) in favoarea noastra, numeroase notificari prin executori si actiuni in instanta numai de 6 procese pe care le-a si pierdut procese in care este reprezentat de casa de avocatura a dl Valeriu Stoica fostul ministru de justitie. De mentionat este faptul ca la fiecare proces aceasta casa de avocatura solicita instantei cheltuieli de judecata  de ordinul zecilor de milioane de lei vechi!

După ce Alexandru Tomescu a cumparat acest apartament am fost contactati de avocatul acestuia, Roșca Radu, care ne-a comunicat că dorește să se întâlnească noi, împreună cu domnul Tomescu.

La întâlnirea care a avut loc cei doi mi-au spus că doresc să cumpere apartamentul nostru , dar noi le-am comunicat ca nu dorim să vindem.

Ulterior am primit și o ofertă de 50.000 Euro pentru o cotă de teren de 159 mp și un apartament de 106 mp, în condițiile în care domnul Alexandru Tomescu deține o cotă de doar 84 mp pentru care a achitat 100.000 Euro, conform actului de vânzare-cumpărare.

Nu am răspuns la aceasta ofertă, iar ulterior cei doi au început o adevărată acțiune de șantaj și teroare judiciară, în sensul că, la scurt după ce am refuzat să vindem, numitul Tomescu, prin avocatul său, l-a contactat pe un prieten de-al meu din Israel cu intenția de a îl șantaja pe acesta și pe mine, și a ne obliga astfel să îi vindem casa la un pret de nimic. Intr-o discutie probata avocatul Rosca Radu recunoaste ca numitul Tomescu Alexandru l-a pus sa il sune pe prietenul meu in Israel si tot Tomescu a aflat nr acestuia de telefon din Israel de la presedintele F.C.E.R. (Federatia Comunitatilor Evreilor din Romania) dl. Aurel Vainer.

Prietenul meu a fost contactat si de Florina Rosca – Florina Neacsu in legatura cu aceeasi casa.

Urmare a refuzului nostru, în scurt timp apartamentul a fost INCENDIAT, I.S.U. (Inspectoratul pentru Situatii de Urgenta) București constatând intr-un proces verbal că focul a fost pus cu intenție. Sectia 3 nu a facut nici un fel de cercetare si nu m-a audiat niciodata, apartamentul nostru fiind incendiat in doar 1 an de 2 ori de fiecare data I.S.U. constatand ca si cauza focul pus cu intentie.

Primul incendiu – Proces verbal I.S.U. 29.07.2011

incendiu 1

Al doilea incendiu – Proces verbal I.S.U. 12.01.2013

incendiu 2

Interesant este faptul ca la a doua incendiere in prezenta unui politist de la Sectia 3 Politie mi s-a spus citez: “Sa le dea foc la toti jidanii ca o sa cumpere toata strada”, politistul aflat la fata locului a refuzat sa dea curs cererii mele de a il identifica pe cetateanul antisemit. La randul sau politistul a refuzat, contrar legislatiei in vigoare, sa se legitimeze sustinand ca el se legitimeaza doar in fata sefului de sectie. Din cate am inteles eu, politistul respectiv apartine Sectiei 3 Politie.

Cele 2 incendii au fost si subiectul emisiunii din data de 12.03.2018  la postul de televiziune NASUL TV, moderata de dl. avocatul Adrian Cuculis invitat jurnalistul. Eduard Ovidiu Ohanesian,

In ceea ce priveste cel de-al doilea incendiu Judecatoria Sectorului 1 Bucuresti s-a pronuntat deja in dosarul 5570/299/2018 si admis actiunea prin care s-a sesizat tergiversarea cercetarilor in dosarul 1274/P/2013 dosar in care seful Sectiei 3 Politie Scorteanu Petre comunica ca s-ar fi efectuat toate cercetarile posibile, instanta asa cum rezulta din acest extras ecris a fost de alta parere:

http://portal.just.ro/299/SitePages/Dosar.aspx?id_dosar=29900000000738755&id_inst=299

Asa a inceput Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu la adresa familie mele

Urmare a primului  incendiu pus cu intentie, (conform proces verbal I.S.U.) Alexandru Tomescu a început in data de 06.01.2013 să facă lucrări de construcție și reparații în lipsa oricarei autorizații, cu toate că se afla în zona protejată nr. 43. Pentru astfel de imobile, conform Legii 50/1991, este absolut necesară obținerea unei autorizații, chiar și pentru lucrări de reparație. Orice lucrare efectuată fără aceste documente este considerată infracțiune.

Am formulat o plângere pentru aceasta infracțiune, (constatata in aceeasi zi de chiar inspectorii primariei care au si dispus sistarea oricaror lucrarii pana la intrarea in legalitate), unde prin abuz și prin nerespectarea Codului de Procedură Penală, după formularea plângerii , nu am fost audiati niciodată, nu ni s-a dat dreptul să aducem martorii, să aducem probe, iar cand am solicitat răspunsul la Poliție și Parchet nu am primit nici un răspuns, ulterior am aflat că, în mod abuziv, s-a dispus neînceperea urmăririi penale de catre doamna procuror Beldie in dosarul 3309/P/2013 care nu considea ca un petent are dreptul sa isi probeze plangerea prin inscrisuri martori si nu are dreptul de a fi audiat in cauza.

Arat faptul ca urmare a acestor lucrari incepute nelegal in lipsa oricarei autorizari apartamentul nostru a fost lasat timp de 2 saptamani fara acoperis prada ploilor abundente, ninsorilor din acea perioada in acest moment ap fiind distrus in proportie de 90%.

Ne-am adresat celor de Inspectia in Constructii si urmare a pasivitatii acestei institutii am mers intr-o audienta la MDRAP (Ministerul Dezvoltarii Regionale si Administratiei Publice)  la secretarul de stat Iulian Matache la aceasta audienta fiind prezent si seful corpului de control pentru Inspectia in Constructii astfel a fost inregistrat memoriul cu nr. 86685/28.10.2013. La acest memoriu nu am primit raspuns nicioadata.

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu

Este important de mentionat ca la scurt timp de la incendierea si distrugerea acoperisului casei noastre printr-o  actiune de asa zisa repartie in lipsa oricarei autorizari , urmare a acestui abuz ne-am adresat domnului ministru al Dezvoltarii Regionale si Administratiei Publice  dl Liviu Dragnea (minister care are in subordine ISC – Inspectia e Stat in Constructii) acest domn a refuzat sa raspunda cererii noastre timp de 1 an de zile si la fel a refuzat sa raspunda cererii noastre de audienta formulate legal si intemeiat.

Nu este intamplator acest lucru deoarece in aceeasi perioda am fost contactat de finul dl Liviu Dragnea , dl Petre Gainescu fost angajat al USLA – actuala BRIGADA ANTITERO A SRI si acesta la modul cel mai direct posibil a inteles sa ne ameninte si intimideze spunand citez:

…”Liviu Dragnea este finul meu… oamenii cu care te lupti sunt foarte sus si ar fi bine sa nu mai faci atatea plangeri deoarece nu esti singur si mai ai aici si pe mama ta Iancu Jeny si pe fratele tau si e pacat sa aiba de suferit”…aceasta discutie poate fi probata.

Nu poate suna decat ca o ironie faptul ca acest domn Liviu Dragnea care intre timp a si fost condamnat si acesta a primit cea mai înaltă distincție a Congresului Evreiesc European, fara ca aceasta institutie sa verifice cu ce se ocupa acest domn si aceasta intreaga grupare infractionala in Romania,

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu continua

Coincidenta sau nu din momentul in care numitul Tomescu Alexandru ne-a devenit vecin in doar 6 (sase) luni am inregistrat 30.000 lei de plata la curent. Si 26.000 lei la apa, iar teava de la gaze ne-a fost taiata cu flexul. Sa fim intelesi nu suntem in povestile cu clanuri interlope care incearca sa ia cu japca o casa, vecinul meu se vrea un om de cultura, nu de canabis!

Astfel apa a fost oprita si ca o surpriza am aflat de la Apa Nova ca imputernicitul meu in relatia cu Apa Nova este avocatul Rosca Radu care in fapt este avocatul dl Tomescu eu nu imi aduc aminte sa il fi imputernicit!

Practic ne-au fost prezentate acte ce emana de la Apa Nova acte unde scrie negru pe alb in dreptul numele meu pe fisa de sistare Apa Nova ca am un avocat in persoana avocatului Rosca Radu.

Coincidenta sau nu, plangerea pentru fals si uz de fals a fost solutionata de doamna procuror Florina Lucan care concluzioneaza scurt “FAPTA NU EXISTA” Apa Nova se comporta ca un avocat al dl Tomescu si imi refuza in repetare randuri sa imi comunice informati la care am dreptul, astfel Apa Nova refuza sa imi comunice procesul verbal de sistare a apei, refuza sa imi comunice fisa de sistare , refuza sa imi comunice situatia platilor si nu in ultimul rand imi comunica chiar in instanta ca reprezentantul meu in relatia cu Apa Nova este avocatul Rosca Radu care este imputernicitul lui Alexandru Tomescu (precizez ca cei doi nu au nici un contract cu Apa Nova)

La fel Apa Nova pentru a acoperi abuzurile dl Tomescu trimite acte false catre mine printr- un birou de mediere (Ardeleanu si Asociatii) practic primim o invitatie la mediere cu confirmare de primire care deja era semnata de primire dar desigur de catre altcineva , am sesizat Politia dar nu ma mira ca si aceasta plangere zace undeva intr-un sertar de peste 1 an de zile. Interesant este si faptul ca acest plic imi este adus sambata cand nu primim deloc posta si nu este adusa de postasul care il cunoastem de peste 10 ani ci de un postas care nu l am vazut niciodata.

In aceeasi maniera dupa solutionarea procesului cu Apa Nova in la judecatoria Sectorului 1 Bucuresti , acest dosar 33633/299/2014 DISPARE pur si simplu din arhiva acestei judecatori singurul lucru care imi este remis de aceasta instanta fiind un raspuns SEC din care rezulta ca acest dosar nu mai poate fi gasit!!! NU este de mirare ca acest lucru s-a intamplat exact dupa ce Apa Nova a depus odata cu conluzile scrise un document falsificat fata de care am intentionam sa ne inscriem in fals, prin disparitia acestui dosar acest fals nu mai poate fi cercetat.

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu

Cu toate ca in ceea ce priveste gazele am reusit sa castigam in mod irevocabil un proces acestia in mod abuziv refuza sa ne rebranseze dupa ce bransamentul nostru platit de noi in urma cu mai bine de 10 ani a fost preluat abuziv de Alexandru Tomescu. Chiar si la solicitarea expresa la ANPC de a ne rebransa GDF Suez refuza sa fac acest lucru.

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu

In anul 2012 Tomescu Tomescu Alexandru promoveaza o actiune prin care revendica ap. nostru in dosarul 52217/299/2012 actiune respinsa de instanta ca neintemeiata atat la fond la Judecatoria Sectorului 1 Bucuresti cat si la apel la Tribunalul Bucuresti unde numitul Tomescu Alexandru a fost reprezentat in instanta chiar de dl Valeriu Stoica care prin pledoaria sa daca se poate numii asa a starnit rasul salii.

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu

Tomescu Alexandru promoveaza doua actiuni in instanta (19061/299/2013 si 19072/299/2013) unde solicita evacuarea noastra, cu toate ca nu detinea nici un titlu asupra apartamentului nostru ambele actiuni fiind la fel respinse ca neintemeiate si raman irevocabile prin neexercitarea nici unei cai de atac.

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu

Ca urmare Alexandru Tomescu formuleaza in mod abuziv o plangere la politie unde reclama lipsa de folosinta in dosarul nr 17971/P/2013 dosar care in urma cercetarilor este solutionat cu N.U.P. deoacere acesta nu face dovada celor sustinute in mod fals in plangere.

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu continua

Ca urmare a faptului ca a pierdut procesele anterioare si nu a putut obtine gratis casa noastra si nici nu am cedat amenintarilor, santajului si terorii judiciare instituite de acesta Tomescu Alexandru cumpara o creanta (autentificata la BIN Alexandra Liuba Liliana sub nr. 551/28.10.2014) a mea de la Banca Transilvania si o pune in mod nelegal in executare astfel in dosarele 32504/301/2014 si 25536/299/2014 instantele resping actiunea executare silita ca neintemeiata. Contractul de cesiune fiind redactat doar intr-un singur exemplar,(nu  este comunicat asa cum prevad si partile in acest contract in mod nelegal) si contine mai multe formulari ce contravin legislatiei in vigoare.

In ceea ce priveste contractul de cesiune de creanta cu nr. 551/28.10.2014 autentificat la BIN Alexandra Liuba Liliana arat faptul ca numita Alexandra Liuba Liliana este deja trimisa in judecata alaturi de mai multi inculpati in dosarul nr. 6632/2/2013/a10 – dosarul Bancherilor BRD pentru infractiunile de iniţiere, constituire de grup infracţional organizat, aderare sau sprijinire a unui asemenea grup (Legea 39/2003 art. 7), aceasta find cea care a realizat si actele pentru tranzactile cu terenuri de la Nana.

Interviu la Radio International Deutschland din data de 21.02.2017 unde se vorbeste despre implicarea S.R.I. in actiunile nelegale ale dl Tomescu Alexandru de a dobandi aceasta proprietate.

Urmare a acestor fapte care le-am povestit dl. Radu Fatulescu membru PNL,  a publicat o ancheta jurnalistica. Urmare a publicarii acestei anchete a fost amenintat in sediul P.N.L. Sector 2 la initiativa adjunctului SIE generalul Dan Chiriac (atasez in acest sens interviul oferit doamnei Bianca Nae, la postul de televiziune Antena 3.)

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu continua

Tomescu Alexandru incearca din nou sa puna in executare creanta de la Banca Transilvania in dosarul 39966/299/2014 si aici in mod nelegal instanta incuvinteaza executare silita (de retinut ca toate cele 3 dosare de executare silita au aceleasi parti , obiect, continut de acte si sentinte diferite! dosarele 32504/301/2014 ; 25536/299/2014 si 39966/299/2014) deci este imposibil sa existe 3 dosare cu aceleasi parti, aceeasi cauza, si aceleasi continut de acte dar cu sentinte diferite!

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu continua

Am solicitat suspendare executarii pana la solutionarea contestatiei la executare. Prin incheierea de sedinta din dosarul 46766/299/2014 executarea in dosarul 39966/299/2014 este suspendata.

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu continua

Am formulat o contestatie la executare care a fost solutionata prin respingerea ei ca neintemeiata in conditile in care a fost solutionata fara ca dosarul prin care s-a incuvintat executare sa fie atasat asa cum prevede legea (dosar 45288/299/2014) astefl dosarul care il contestatm (39966/299/2014) nu s-a aflat pe masa judecatorului in momentul pronuntarii sentintei.

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu continua

De la aceasta data cu toate ca decizia nu este una definitiva si executarea este suspendata in mod nelegal numitul Tomescu prin BEJ Somildoc Paula Daniela face tot posibilul pentru a o da afara din casa pe mama mea Iancu Jeny care este si victima a holocaustului

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu continua

In pararel cu aceste actiuni aceasta grupare infractionala trimite la inaintare firma Baby spa a domnului  Dan Stroe fost director de achitizitii al ANAF (care a fost prins cu 600.000. euro cash in seif) , firma care prin intermediul directoarei Anca Grecu incearca fara succes sa imi insceneze un dosar de evaziune fiscala.

Intermediarul acestei tranzactii este nimeni altul decat Cornel Bortan patronul firmei Bacos care anterior a mai incercat acest lucru prin firma Alpha Rochas din aeroportul Otopeni si prin firma de consultanta Soter s.a.

Nu am dat curs acestei provocari insa dl Cornel Bortan nu se lasa si imi solicita in mod inexplicabil sa i fac un contract de inchiriere pentru exact vila mult ravnita de dl Tomescu Alexandru, evident refuz.

La scurt timp apare din acest neant nimeni alta decat Magda Stroe directorul adjunct al I.C.R. Londra (Institutul Cultural Roman) care incearca si ea acelasi lucru ca si ceilalti sa insceneze un dosar de evaziune la scurt timp dupa refuzul meu de a lucra cu I.C.R. Londra toate contactele mele online cu I.C.R. Londra sunt blocate in conditile in care anterior acestui refuz eram catalogat de chiar doamna Magda Stroe ca …“un artist de TOP”…

De remarcat cercul strans al acestora spun asta deoarece dupa ce generalul SIE Dan Chiriac a fost obligat sa paraseasca S.U.A. in 1990 si a gasit un loc caldut la Ambasada Romaniei de la Londra. (conform biografiei publice a acestuia).

M-am adresat si cu o solicitare de a fi primit intr-o audienta si dl .presedinte Aurel Vainer unde am crezut ( in naivitatea mea) ca voi primii sprjin si consiliere.

Astfel in data de 23.04.2014 am facut o cerere de a fi primiti in audienta impreuna cu mama mea.

La aceasta cerere nu am primit nici un fel de raspuns timp de 6 luni si incercarea mea a primi un rapsuns a primit reactii dure, chiar partea consilierului dl presedinte Aurel Vainer , dl Silvian Horn caruia i-am solicitat in cadrul unei intrevederi la sediul F.C.E.R. (Federatia Comunitatilor Evreilor din Romania) sa imi comunice care este motivul pentru care imi este refuzata aceasta audienta. Raspunsul m-a uluit pe mine si pe mama mea citez “daca mai insistati chem paza si va dau afara” amenintare facuta in prezenta celor doua secretare ale F.C.E.R. Asa inteleg mai marii acesti comunitati sa conduca si reprezinte pe noi putinii care am mai ramas. Dl Silvian Horn avea si motive sa faca acest gest deoarece anterior ca acest POGROM sa inceapa o persoana din anturajul numitului Tomescu a facut demersuri la F.C.E.R. pentru a afla daca casa mea este in grija F.C.E.R. in baza unui contract. Acest lucru fiind confirmat de dl Horn intr–o discutie avuta discutie care o pot proba, ulterior cand dl Silvian Horn a vazut ca pe acest aspect vin si solicit o audienta si lucrurile se complica a negat aceasta discutie.

Dupa 6 luni urmare a unor demersuri am fost primit in audienta la dl presedinte Aurel Vainer ocazie cu care i-am explicat acestuia problemele cu care eu si familia mea ne confruntam si am depus la biroul acestuia o solicitare pentru a face in numele nostru demersuri la Comisia de Abuzuri, Comisia Juridica si Comisia de Apararare de la Parlament. Acesta m-a asigurat ca va face acest lucru.

Astazi la 1 an si 2 luni de la aceasta intalnire nu am primit nici un raspuns cu toate ca am solicitat in scris acest lucru de 3 ori.

Telefonic si verbal la sediul F.C.E.R. (Federatia Comunitatilor Evreilor din Romania) dl Vexler pe un ton arogant si batjocoritor mi-a spus ca aceste demersuri nu se pot face oficial si ca nu exista nr de inregistare la cele 3 dosare care le-am depus pentru cele 3 comisii si ca problema mea nu e de competenta F.C.E.R. (Federatia Comunitatilor Evreilor din Romania) Numai vorbesc de comportamentul grobian , lipsit de respect si jignitor al paznicilor de la sediul F.C.E.R  care de cand am formulat aceste cereri au comportament abuziv. La ultima deplasare la sediul F.C.E.R. chiar in prezenta dl Vexler paznicii ne-au agresat verbal si ne-au interzis accesul in conditile in care de fata era chiar dl Vexler care a spus ca nu e problema lui ca cei de la paza ( paza platita si din contribuitia noastra) nu ne dau voie sa intram in sediul F.C.E.R. Desigur ma intreba de ce aceasta organizatie se mai cheama Comunitatea Evreilor deoarece nu are nici o legatura cu membrii sai?

Mentionez ca familia noastra a facut si demersuri la C.N.C.D. ( Consiliul National pentru Combaterea Discriminarii)  unde am constatat ca in opinia doamnei secretar de stat dr. Gheorghiu Luminita astfel de manisfestari, abuzuri si incalcari ale legii sunt doar un simplu mod in care oamenii isi pot exprima in mod liber opinia!

Desigur ma intreb?

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu mai continua?

Revenim cu un update: raspunsul este da!

Pe data de 08.02.2016 Ambasadorul BUNAVOINTEI Tomescu Alexandru prin BEJ Paula Somildoc va scoate ap. de 2 camere de la etaj la vanzare pentru suma modica de: 15.000. euro scriu si in litere ca sa nu creada cineva ca este o confuzie: cincisprezece mii euro.

Licitatatie care a avut loc deja Tomescu Alexandru fiind singurul participant la aceasta licitatie trucata!

Pentru ca asa cum a spus in instanta prin casa de avocatura Stoica si Asociatii, “…clientul nostru numai poate astepta are nevoie de bani”…in conditile in care Tomescu Alexandru nu este titularul acestei creante ci banca de la care a cumparat creanta special in acest scop – BTR , banca care nu a incercat niciodata sa scoata la vanzare acest apartament pentru aceasta suma modica. Numai vorbesc de faptul ca a cumparat aceasta creanta cu 7500 de Euro pentru a o pune in executare cu 15.000 de Euro si dobanda de 38 % , un adevarat AMBASADOR al BUNAVOINTEI!

La o simpla cautare pe internet am observat ca este un modus operandi la Ambasadorul Bunavointei Tomescu Alexandru de a participa singur la licitatii, concursuri etc, in acelasi mod acesta a obtinut si vioara Stradivarii in urma unui concurs la care a fost singurul participant asa cum rezulta si din acest material:

Update 17.02.2016:

Astazi 17.02.2016 Judecatoria Sectorului 1 Bucuresti a admis actiunea noastra impotriva ordonantelor Parchetului de pe langa Judecatoria Sectorului 1 Bucuresti, citez:
Solutia pe scurt: În baza art. 341 alin(6) lit. b C.proc.pen., admite plângerea formulată de petentul MOLDOVEANU NICOLAE. Desfiinţează soluţia de clasare dispusă prin Ordonanţa nr. 14008/P/2013 din data de 23.07.2015 şi menţinută prin Ordonanţa nr. 2083/ll-2/2015 din data de 14.09.2015 ale Parchetului de pe lângă Judecătoria Sectorului 1 Bucureşti. Trimite cauza la Parchetul de pe lângă Judecătoria Sectorului 1 Bucureşti, în vederea completării urmăririi penale, sub aspectul săvârşirii infracţiunilor prevăzute de art. 193 alin(2) din Legea nr. 123/2012, cu aplicarea art. 5 C.pen. şi art. 228-229 alin(3) C.pen. cu aplicarea art. 5 C.pen., cu aplicarea art. 38 C.pen. În baza art. 276 alin(1) C.proc.pen., respinge cererea de acordare a cheltuielilor judiciare, formulată de intimatul Tomescu Alexandru, ca neîntemeiată. În baza art. 275 alin(3) C.proc.pen., cheltuielile judiciare rămân în sarcina Statului. Definitivă. Pronunţată în şedinţa din camera de consiliu, azi, 17.02.2016.
Document: Încheiere finală (dezinvestire) 17.02.2016

Actiunea il are ca intimat pe Tomescu Alexandru care este cercetat pentru bransare ilegala la gaze furt si furt calificat de gaze la adresa str Grigore Cobalcescu nr 13 adresa de la care doreste sa o evacueze fortat pe doamna Iancu Jeny si familia ei.

Practic ap de la parter proprietatea numitului Tomescu Alexandru era bransat la teava noastra de gaze care era la etaj in lipsa oricarei autorizari, contract si acord al nostru asa cum prevede legea.

solutie portal instanta dosar 101795/299/2015

Decizia Judecatoriei Sectorului 1 Bucuresti privind bransarea ilegala a lui Tomescu Alexandru la bransamentul nostru de gaze, a fost preluata de ziarul Puterea:

puterea gaze

Va puteti arata suportul fata de aceasta cauza aici:

alexandru tomescu
cauza

Va puteti arata suportul si pe acest grup de sustinere:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/736709933126476/

group
grup sustinere

acest caz este si subiectul unei anchete a ziarului Puterea :

puterea online tomescu

http://www.puterea24.ro/social/ambasadorul-bunavointei-violonistul-alexandru-tomescu-a-declansat-razboiul-imobiliar-cu-tenta-antisemita-128959.html

primul articol aparut in ziarul Criteriul National in data de 27.07.20176

http://www.criteriul.ro/pogromul-si-fata-nevazuta-a-violonistului-alexandru-tomescu/

al doilea articol aparaut in ziarul Criteriul National in data de 17.03.2017

https://www.criteriul.ro/progromul-impotriva-domnului-nicolae-moldoveanu-si-a-mamei-domniei-sale-continua/

si de cotidianul Flux24.ro articol din data de 03.04.2017

Ancheta dl Adrian Radu fost ofiter SRI, in publicatia Incisiv de Prahova din data de 26.04.2017

MAFIA cu “parfum” de ”servicii”/Incitari la ură de rasă/ Poate procurorul general al României are un punct de vedere în acest caz, mai ales că a fost sesizat oficial

Interviu la INTERNATIONAL RADIO DEUTSCHLAND din data de 27 04 2017 unde la minutul 14.31 se mentioneaza ca autorul articolului din ziarul Incisiv de Prahova , dl Adrian Radu a fost amenintat si intimidat sa nu mai faca anchete jurnalistice pe acest subiect, la fel moderatorul postului de radio INTERNATIONAL RADIO DEUTSCHLAND dl Alex Oprea  confirma ca si acesta a fost amenintat si intimidat dupa ce a facut emisiuni pe acelasi subiect.

 

La aceste infractiuni si a adus aportul si firma RCS-RDS care a instalat in biroul meu un modem modificat cu trafic nelimitat in SRI si DNA

Sesizati telefonic si in scris firma RCS – RDS nu recunoaste prezenta la biroul meu a unei echipe RDS sosita la biroul meu cu o masina inscriptionata RDS pentru a face un asa zis “UPGRADE”

Rds

din articolul de mai jos reiese ca Tomescu Alexandru este membru in masonerie in Marea Loja Naţională din România (MLNR) http://jurnalul.ro/stire-special/aniversarea-masoneriei-albastre-in-epoca-flacarii-violet-533604.html

Articol publicat de canalul media Israel 411

for english version click here

Termeni si conditii

Pogromul si Fața nevăzută a violonistului Alexandru Tomescu-

The Pogrom and the dark side of the GOODWILL Ambassador violonist Alexandru Tomescu

Published previously in 19 february 2014 by gicacontra, a story about abuses that continues until today 2017

The Pogrom and the unseen face of violinist Alexandru Tomescu-

for romanian version click here

If, in those days of sad memory, the Jews were being exterminated on Wagner’s music, a family of Jews from Romania, amongst which there is also a victim of the holocaust, is being forcedly evacuated on Bach’s music! By violinist Alexandru Tomescu.

alexandru tomescu str. grigore cobalcescu nr 13 Bucuresti
Iancu Jeny – str. Grigore Cobalcescu nr 13 Bucuresti – Alexandru Tomescu

The violinist’s pogrom starts by saying that my mother, Iancu Jeny, is attempting to live in the house that is most coveted, without any legal right, by  Tomescu Alexandru

Mrs. Iancu Jeny, victim of the holocaust, member of AERVH (Association of Romanian Jews, Victims of the Holocaust) is not facing such a sad situation for the first time; the Romanian State put this family in the street in the 40s for the simple fact that they were Jews.

Iancu Jeny
Iancu Jeny

This case of Mrs. Iancu Jeny was the subject of a major journalistic inquiry on the first page of a major newspaper in Romania, Evenimentul Zilei on 17.09.2018

online version:

https://evz.ro/violonistul-stradivarius-canta-fals.html

printed version:

Television enquiry  by Mr. Paul Iurea at ” Vama Verde ” ( Part I ), on 2 July 2017 on ” Nasul TV ” with  Mr. Nicolae Moldoveanu, together with attorney’s Mr. Adrian Cuculis and Mr. Mădălin Penciu.

Today, even though the Romanian state admitted that sad era, there still are persons knowingly ignoring it and committing serious deeds with the support of criminal groups that include police agents, prosecutors, judges, executors, notaries, banks, the said Tomescu Alexandru , the law firm Stoica si Asociatii , and, finally, the deputy of the FSIE deputy command General Dan Chiriac , who commands this series from the shadows, though his intermediaries

But coming back to the subject matter of the article.

The apartment is part of a beautiful villa situated opposite Cișmigiu Park – we are the owners of one part of the villa, namely 2 rooms upstairs; the other half belonged, until 2011, to a family that obtained it following a claim.

grigore cobalcescu nr 13
13 – Grigore Cobalcescu street, Bucharest

Subsequently, that part of the villa was bought in 2011 by Alexandru Tomescu for the price of 100,000 Euro, and for another 50,000 Euro, Alexandru Tomescu also bought the right to demand indemnities from the State, respectively from A.N.R.P. (National Authority for Property Return). As far as I know, he allegedly bought that part of the villa without seeing it first.

The question arises, of course, who would buy part of a villa for 100.000 Euro without seeing it? Who would pay another 50,000 euro to receive indemnities from A.N.R.P.(National Authority for Property Return) without having “prepared the ground” first and without having the certainty that, in the end, they would do what they set their mind to. In the following lines, I will give you these answers.

It must be said that Tomescu Alexandru makes no endeavor to obtain indemnities from A.N.R.P. (National Authority for Property Return), as he has the right by contract; instead, he decides to obtain these indemnities from our family.

So it begins, directly and through intermediaries, an entire operation of terror that includes activities such as: interruption of utilities by illegal maneuvers in complicity with Apa Nova s.a, GDF Suez, illegal buildings without any permit, intentionally damaging the roof of our house in full winter, destruction, complaints with the police, settled by N.U.P. (Failure to begin criminal prosecution) in our favor, numerous notices through executors and actions before the court – 6 trials, that he lost, trials where he was represented by Mr. Valeriu Stoica’s law firm – former minister of justice. We are mentioning that, during every trial, this law firm asked the court to pay court costs of tens of millions of Old Lei!

After Alexandru Tomescu bought this apartment, we were contacted by his lawyer,

Radu Rosca , who informed us that he wished to meet us, together with Mr. Tomescu.

At the meeting, the two of them told me that they intended to buy our apartment, but we informed them we did not want to sell.

Later, we received an offer of 50,000 Euro for a land share of 159 sqm and for an apartment of 106 mp, considering that Mr. Alexandru Tomescu owns a share of only 84 sqm, for which he paid 100,000 Euro, according to the sale-purchase deed.

We have not answered this offer, and later, the two of them started a real blackmail and judicial terror situation, namely, shortly after we refused to sell, Tomescu, by his lawyer, contacted a friend of mine from Israel with the intention to blackmail him and myself, and thus to force us to sell the house for a very insignificant price. In a discussion used as evidence by Radu Rosca he admits that Tomescu Alexandru asked him to call my friend in Israel, and it is also Tomescu who found out his phone number in Israel, from the chairman of F.C.E.R. (Federation of Jewish Communities in Romania), Mr. Aurel Vainer.

My friend from Israel was also contacted by Florina Rosca – Florina Neagu an attorney from Bucharest  also in connection with this house.

Following our refusal, shortly after, the apartment was set on FIRE, and I.S.U. (Inspectorate for Situations of Emergency) from Bucharest acknowledged, in a report, that the fire had been set intentionally. Police Station no. 3 did not make any investigation and never heard me in this matter, and still, our apartment was set on fire twice during 1 year, and, each time, I.S.U. acknowledged that the fire had been set intentionally.

First fire – I.S.U. Report of 29.07.2011

incendiu 1

Second fire – I.S.U. Report of 12.01.2013

incendiu 2

It is interesting that, during the second fire, before a policeman of Police Station no. 3, I was addressed with the following phrase, and I quote: “Let them set all the Jews on fire, or else they will buy the entire street”, but the policeman on duty declined my request to identify the anti-Semitic citizen. On his turn, the policeman refused, contrary to the laws in force, to identify himself, claiming that he only identified himself before his Chief. As far as I found out, that policeman works at Police Station no. 3.

Both arsons where the subject of television debate on 12.03.2018   NASUL TV, with the lawyer  Adrian Cuculis and the journalist Eduard Ovidiu Ohanesian,

This is how violinist Tomescu Alexandru ’s pogrome against my family started

Following the first fire set intentionally (according to I.S.U. report), Alexandru Tomescu started, on 06.01.2013, to make construction and repair works without any authorization, even though he was in the protected area no. 43. For such properties, according to the Law 50/1991, it is absolutely necessary to obtain a permit, even for repair works. Any work carried out without these documents is considered to be an offense.

I filed a complaint for this offense, (acknowledged on the same day by inspectors of the City Hall, who ordered the interruption of all works until they became legal), for which, by abuse and failure to observe the Criminal Procedure Code, after filing the complaint, we were never heard, we were not given the right to bring witnesses, to bring evidence, and when we asked for answers, at the Police and at the Prosecutor’s Office, we received none; later we found out that, abusively, Prosecutor Beldie had ordered not to initiate the criminal pursuit in file 3309/P/2013, as she believed that an appellant did not have the right to prove their complaints by documents, witnesses, and did not have the right to be heard in the case.

I am hereby showing that, following these works, illegally initiated in lack of any authorization, our apartment was left for 2 weeks without a roof, and it was severely damaged by the heavy rains and snows of that time; currently, the apartment is destroyed by 90%.

We addressed the Inspection for Constructions and, following all lack of action by this institution, we went on a hearing at MDRAP (Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration), before the State Secretary Iulian Matache; the hearing was also attended by the chief of the control body for the Inspection for Constructions; the memo no. 86685/28.10.2013 was therefore registered. We never received any answer to this memo.

Violinist Alexandru Tomescu actions continues:

It is important to specify that, shortly after the fire and the destruction of our roof, by so-called unauthorized repairs, following this abuse, we addressed the Minister of Minister of Regional Development and Public Administration Mr Liviu Dragnea ((minister in whose suborder is the   ISC – State Construction Inspection ) but this gentleman refused to answer our petition for 1 year, and also refused to answer our hearing request, that had been filed legally and that included our reasonable motivations.

It is not by chance that, in the same interval of time, I was contacted by Liviu Dragnea’s godfather, Mr. Petre Gainescu, former employee of USLA – the current   ANTITERRORISM BRIGADE OF THE ROMANIAN INTELLIGENCE SERVICE  and he understood to threaten us and intimidate us in the most direct manner, by saying to us, and I quote:

…”Liviu Dragnea is my godson … the people that you are fighting with are very highly situated and you’d better stop filing so many complaints, because you are not alone here, you also have your mother, Iancu Jeny, and your brother, and it would be a pity that they suffer”…this discussion may be proven.

It is most ironic that this gentleman, Liviu Dragnea, who, in the meantime, was also convicted, and who received the highest distinction of the European Jewish Congress, without proper investigations carried out by this institution, to check what this gentleman was really dealing with, and without making investigations concerning this entire criminal group in Romania.

Violinist Alexandru Tomescu actions continues:

Coincidence or not, since Tomescu Alexandru became our neighbor, in only 6 (six) months we registered 30,000 lei debt for electric power supply. And 26,000 lei for water, and the gas pipeline has been cut by an electric cutting machine. Let us be understood, we are not in one of those stories of underground clans trying to reave our house, my neighbor presumes to be a man of culture, not of canabis!

Therefore, the water supply was interrupted and, in surprise, we found out from Apa Nova that my attorney-in-fact in the relation with Apa Nova was the lawyer Rosca Radu, who, in fact, is the lawyer of Mr. Tomescu, and I do not recall empowering him in any way!Technically, we were presented documents issued by Apa Nova, where it is written very clearly, next to my name, on the Apa Nova chart of interruption of supplies, that I have a lawyer, in the person of lawyer Rosca Radu.

Coincidence or not, the complaint for forgery and usage of forgery has been settled by prosecutor Florina Lucan, who concludes, in brief, that “THE DEED DOES NOT EXIST”. Apa Nova behaves as Mr. Tomescu’s lawyer and repeatedly refuses to communicate to me information that I am entitled to know, therefore Apa Nova refuses to communicate to me the water supply interruption report, the interruption chart, the statement of payments and, ultimately, it informs me before the court that my representative in the relation with Apa Nova is the lawyer Rosca Radu, who is the attorney-in-fact of Alexandru Tomescu (I would like to specify that the two of them have no contract signed with Apa Nova).

Likewise, Apa Nova, to cover the abuses of Mr. Tomescu, sends me false documents through a mediation office (Ardeleanu and Associates); technically, we receive an invitation to mediation, with acknowledgement of receipt, which was already signed for receipt, naturally by somebody else; we notified the Police, but I am not surprised that this complaint has most likely been forgotten in some drawer for more than 1 year. What is interesting is that this envelope has been brought to me on Saturday, a day when the mail is never delivered, and it is not delivered by our postman, whom we know for more than 10 years, but by a man whom we have never seen before.

In the same manner, after settling the trial with Apa Nova at the First Instance Court of District 1 of Bucharest, this file 33633/299/2014 simply DISAPPEARS from the records of this first instance court, and the only thing that is given to me by this court is a very DRY answer stating that this file can no longer be found!!! I am not surprised that this happened precisely after Apa Nova submitted, together with the written conclusions, a forged document against which we were determined to press charges; but, since this file has disappeared, it can no longer be investigated.

Violinist Alexandru Tomescu actions continues:

Even though, as regards the gas, we succeeded in irrevocably winning a trial, they abusively refused to reconnect us, after our connection, paid by us more than 10 years ago, was abusively taken over by Alexandru Tomescu. Even on the express request to reconnect us, filed to ANPC, GDF Suez refuses to do so.

Violinist Alexandru Tomescu actions continues:

In 2012, Tomescu Alexandru files an action by which he claims our app., in file 52217/299/2012, action rejected by the court as ungrounded, both on the merits, at the First Instance Court of District 1 of Bucharest, and for appeal, at the Bucharest Law Court, where Tomescu Alexandru was represented by no other than Valeriu Stoica, the former minister of justice who, through his pleading, if it may be called so, made the entire audience burst into laughter.

Violinist Alexandru Tomescu actions continues:

Tomescu Alexandru files two actions before the court (19061/299/2013 and 19072/299/2013), where he demands our eviction, even though he owned no title over our apartment, both actions being rejected as ungrounded and remaining irrevocable by not using any way of attack

Violinist Alexandru Tomescu actions continues:

Alexandru Tomescu made a compliant in which he misinformed the police that we are living in his house illegally after police research-inquiry and based on evidence that we provided his complaint was dismissed as not proved and illegal in case number 17971/P/2013 because he did not prove those false claims in the complaint.

Violinist Alexandru Tomescu actions continues:

Consequently, Alexandru Tomescu abusively files a complaint to the police, where he alleges the lack of use in file no. 17971/P/2013, a file which, following investigations, is settled with N.U.P., because it does not provide evidence to support the false allegations written in the complaint.

The Pogrom of violinist Alexandru Tomescu continues

After losing the previous trials and after the failure to obtain our house for free, seeing that we have not given in to his threats, blackmail and judicial terror, Tomescu Alexandru buys an outstanding debt (authenticated by Office of Independent Notary Alexandra Liuba Liliana with no. 551/28.10.2014) of mine with Banca Transilvania and illegally executes it in files 32504/301/2014 and 25536/299/2014. The courts reject the action of foreclosure as ungrounded. The assignment contract is edited in only one copy (it is not communicated as stipulated by the parties to the contract and it is unlawful) and it contains several wordings that violate the laws in force.

As regards the outstanding debt assignment contract with no. 551/28.10.2014 authenticated by Office of Independent Notary Alexandra Liuba Liliana, I would like to show that Alexandra Liuba Liliana has already been arraigned, together with several defendants, in file no. 6632/2/2013/a10 – file of BRD bankers for offenses of initiation, constitution of an organized criminal group, adhesion to or support of such a group (Law 39/2003 art. 7), and she is the one who executed the documents for the land transactions of Nana.

Interview at Radio International Deutschland of 21.02.2017, where the topic is the involvement of the Romanian Intelligence Service in the unlawful actions of Mr. Tomescu Alexandru to acquire this property.

Following these deeds that we have described, Mr. Radu Fatulescu, member of the National Liberal Party, published a journalist investigation. Following the publishing of this investigation, he was threatened at the office of the National Liberal Party of district 2, on the initiative of the deputy of the Foreign Intelligence Service, general Dan Chiriac (I am hereby attaching the interview given to Mrs. Bianca Nae at the TV station Antena 3.)

Alexandru Tomescu pogrom continues:

Tomescu Alexandru is again trying to execute my outstanding debt with Banca Transilvania in file 39966/299/2014 and here unlawfully the court agrees with the foreclosure (it must be mentioned that all the 3 foreclosure files have the same parties, the same object, contain the same documents, but have different final decisions! Files 32504/301/2014; 25536/299/2014 and 39966/299/2014); it is quite impossible that there are 3 files with the same parties, same cause and same documents, but with different final decisions!

Violinist Alexandru Tomescu actions continues

We asked for the suspension of the execution until the settlement of the opposition to execution. By the session report in file 46766/299/2014, the execution in file 39966/299/2014 is suspended.

Violinist Alexandru Tomescu actions continues:

We worded an opposition to the execution, that was settled by rejecting it as ungrounded, as it had been settled without attaching it to the file ordering the execution, according to the law (file 45288/299/2014); therefore, the file that we are opposing (39966/299/2014) has not been on the judge’s table the moment when the final decision was given.

Violinist Alexandru Tomescu actions continues:

Starting with that date, although the decision is not final, and the execution is unlawfully suspended, Mr. Tomescu, through the Office of the Legal Receiver Somildoc Paula Daniela, does whatever he can to throw my mother, Iancu Jeny, victim of the holocaust, out of the house

Violinist Alexandru Tomescu actions continues:

In parallel with these actions, this criminal group sends as representative the enterprise Baby spa owned by Mr. Dan Stroe, former procurement manager of the National Tax Administration Authority (who was caught with 600,000 Euro cash in his safe box) , enterprise that, through its manager, Anca Grecu, is unsuccessfully attempting to frame me an embezzlement file.

The intermediate of this transaction is no other than Cornel Bortan, the owner of Bacos enterprise, who previously tried to do this through Alpha Rochas at Otopeni Airport and through the consulting firm Soter s.a.

I have not gone forward with the challenge, but Mr. Cornel Bortan would not let it go, and he asks me without any explanation to sign a lease contract for the precise villa most coveted by Mr. Tomescu Alexandru, which I obviously refuse.

Shortly after, no other than Magda Stroe, the deputy manager of I.C.R. London (Romanian Cultural Institute) shows up out of the blue, trying, the same as the others, to frame an embezzlement file on me; shortly after my refusal to work with I.C.R. London, all my online contacts with I.C.R. London are blocked, even though, before this refusal, I had been catalogued even by Mrs. Magda Stroe as …“a TOP artist”…

Please note their limited circle, and I say so because it started being created after general Dan Chiriac of the Foreign Intelligence service was ordered to leave USA in 1990, and found a nice little warm place at the Embassy of Romania in London (according to his public biography).

I addressed a request for an appointment with Chairman Aurel Vainer, where I thought (in my naivety) that I might receive support and counseling.

Thus, on 23.04.2014, I made a request for an appointment together with my mother.

This request has not received any answer for 6 months, and my attempt for a response generated very harsh reactions, even from the counselor of chairman Aurel Vainer, Mr. Silvian Horn, to whom I have asked, during a meeting at the office of F.C.E.R. (Federation of Jewish Communities of Romania), to tell me the reason why such an appointment was refused to me. His answer baffled both me, and my mother, and I quote: “if you insist, I will call security to kick you out” – a threat made before the two secretaries of F.C.E.R. This is how the directors of this community understand to lead and represent the few of us that are still around. Mr. Silvian Horn had reasons to make such a gesture, because, before this entire POGROM began, a person in the entourage of the said Tomescu interceded with F.C.E.R. to find out whether my house was in the care of F.C.E.R. upon contract. This has been confirmed to me by Mr. Horn himself, in a discussion that he and I had and which I can demonstrate. Later, when Mr. Silvian Horn saw that, in this regard, I was asking for an appointment, and that things started to get complicated, he denied us having such a conversation.

After 6 months, following certain endeavors, I was received for a hearing by Chairman Aurel Vainer, when I could explain to him the issues that my family and I were confronting with, and I submitted to his office a request to make intercessory, on our behalf, with the Commission of Abuses, with the Legal Commission and with the Commission of Defense of the Parliament. He ensured me that he would do so.

Today, 1 year and 2 months after that meeting, I have received no answer, although I requested this 3 times in writing.

By phone and verbally, at the office of F.C.E.R. (Federation of Jewish Communities of Romania), Mr. Vexler, on an arrogant and mocking tone, told me such intercessory cannot be made officially, and there was no registration number for the 3 files I had submitted to the 3 commissions, and my problem was not under the competence of F.C.E.R. (Federation of Jewish Communities of Romania). Not to mention the raunchy behavior, lacking all respect, and the offensive language of the guards at the office of F.C.E.R, who have behaved abusively even since I filed the requests. At my last visit at the office of F.C.E.R., even in the presence of Mr. Vexler, the guards aggressed us verbally and forbade our access, while Mr. Vexler was present, but claimed that it was not his problem that the security guards would not let us enter the office of F.C.E.R. (guards that we pay from our contribution). I certainly wonder why this community is called the Jewish Community, if it has no relation with its members?

I would like to specify that our family also interceded with C.N.C.D. (National Council for Fight against Discrimination), where I found out that, in the opinion of the State Secretary Gheorghiu Luminita, such manifestations, abuses or violations of the law are merely a way by which people may freely express their opinion!

Naturally, I wonder?

Is the Pogrom of violinist Alexandru Tomescu still continuing?

We are coming back with an update: the answer is yes!

On 08.02.2016, the Ambassador of GOODWILL, Tomescu Alexandru, through the Office of the Judicial receiver Paula Somildoc, intends to put on sale 2 rooms situated on the 1st floor, for the ridiculous amount of: 15,000 Euro – I will also write it in letters, so there is no confusion: fifteen thousand euro.

The bidding had already taken place, and the only participant was Tomescu Alexandru, who obviously wan it!

Because, as he stated at court through the law firm Stoica and Associates, “…our client can no longer wait, he needs money”…however, Tomescu Alexandru is not the holder of this outstanding debt, but the bank is, from which he bought the debt precisely for these purposes – BTR but the bank never attempted to put the apartment on sale for such a ridiculous amount. Not to mention that he bought the debt for 7500 Euro to execute it with 15,000 Euro and the interest of 38 %, a true AMBASSADOR OF GOODWILL

At a simple search on the internet, I noticed that it is a modus operandi of the Ambassador of Goodwill, Tomescu Alexandru, to participate in biddings, competitions etc. all by himself; it is how he acquired the Stradivarius violin, following a competition where he was the only participant, as demonstrated by this material:

Update 17.02.2016:

Today, 17.02.2016, the First Instance Court of District 1 Bucharest admitted our action against the ordinances of the Prosecutor’s Office subordinated to the First Instance Court of District 1 of Bucharest, I quote:

The summarized solution: on the grounds of art. 341 para (6) letter b of the Criminal Procedure Code, it admits the complaint filed by the appellant MOLDOVEANU NICOLAE. It cancels the classification solution ordered by Ordinance no. 14008/P/2013 of 23.07.2015 and preserved by Ordinance no. 2083/ll-2/2015 of 14.09.2015 of the Prosecutor’s Office subordinated to the First Instance Court of District 1 of Bucharest. It refers the case to the Prosecutor’s Office subordinated to the First Instance Court of District 1 of Bucharest, in order to complete the criminal pursuit, under the aspect of committing the offenses stipulated by art. 193 para. (2) of the Law no. 123/2012, with application of art. 5 of the Criminal Code and art. 228-229 para. (3) of the Criminal Code, with application of art. 5 of the Criminal Code, with application of art. 38 of the Criminal Code. On the grounds of art. 276 para. (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, it rejects the petition to grant court costs, worded by the respondent Tomescu Alexandru as ungrounded. Upon art. 275 para. (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the judicial expenses remain in the charge of the State. Final. Given in the council room meeting, today, 17.02.2016. Document: Final conclusion (cancellation of designation) 17.02.2016

The respondent of the action is Tomescu Alexandru, who is investigated for illegal connection to the gas mains, theft and qualified theft of gas, at the address of 13 Grigore Cobalcescu street, where he wishes to forcedly evacuate Mrs. Iancu Jeny and her family.

Technically, the ground floor apartment belonging to Tomescu Alexandru was connected to our gas pipeline, which was upstairs, without any permit, contract and without our consent, according to the law.

The decision of the First Instance Court of District 1 of Bucharest concerning the illegal connection of Tomescu Alexandru to our gas connection has been taken over by Puterea newspaper:

You may show your support for this cause here:

alexandru tomescu
cauza

You may also show your support on this support group:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/736709933126476/

group
grup sustinere

this case is also the subject of an investigation made by Puterea newspaper:

puterea online tomescu

http://www.puterea24.ro/social/ambasadorul-bunavointei-violonistul-alexandru-tomescu-a-declansat-razboiul-imobiliar-cu-tenta-antisemita-128959.html

the first article published in Criteriul National newspaper of 27.07.20176

the second article published in Criteriul National newspaper of 17.03.2017

https://www.criteriul.ro/progromul-impotriva-domnului-nicolae-moldoveanu-si-a-mamei-domniei-sale-continua/

and in the daily Flux24.ro, article of 03.04.2017

The enterprise RCS-RDS also contributed to these offenses, which set up in my office an altered modem with unlimited traffic to the Romanian Intelligence Service and to the National Anti-Corruption Department.

Notified by phone and in writing, the enterprise RCS – RDS denies the presence, in my office, of an RDS team that arrived, in fact, at my office with a machine bearing the RDS logo, to make a so-called “UPGRADE”.

Rds

 

The article below reveals that Tomescu Alexandru is a franc mason member of the National Grand Lodge of Romania (MLNR)

http://jurnalul.ro/stire-special/aniversarea-masoneriei-albastre-in-epoca-flacarii-violet-533604.html

Article in Israel 411 media channel

for romanian version click here

Termeni si conditii

The Pogrom and the dark side of the GOODWILL Ambassador violonist Alexandru Tomescu