Pogromul si Fața nevăzută a violonistului Alexandru Tomescu-

Publicat în 19 februarie 2014 de gicacontra, un articol despre abuzuri ce sunt comise pana in prezent 2017

 

Pogromul si Fața nevăzută a violonistului Alexandru Tomescu-

Toate abuzurile descrise mai fost au fost savarsite pentru ca apartamentul in care a locuit doamna Iancu Jeny victima a Holocaustului din Romania si Supravietuitoare a Holocaustului din Romania sa ajunga in proprietatea violonistului Alexandru Tomescu si in folosinta fundatiei Magic Home a fostului minustru al sanatatii din parteA U.S.R. Vlad Voculescu  si actual consilier al presedintelui Romaniei Nicusor Dan

for english version click here

Dacă in vremurile de trista amintire evreii erau exterminati pe muzică de Wagner, o familie de evrei in care exista si o victima holocaustului din Romania este evacuată forțat pe muzica de Bach! de catre violonistul Alexandru Tomescu.
alexandru tomescu str. grigore cobalcescu nr 13 Bucuresti
Iancu Jeny – str. Grigore Cobalcescu nr 13 Bucuresti – Alexandru Tomescu

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu incepe prin a spune ca mama mea Iancu Jeny incearca sa locuiasca in casa mult ravnita fara nici un fel de drept legal de numitul Tomescu Alexandru.

Doamna Iancu Jeny victima holocaustului, membra AERVH (Asociatia Evreilor din Romania Victime ale Holocasutului) nu este la prima intamplare trista de acest gen statul roman trimitand aceasta familie in strada si in anii 40 pentru simplul fapt ca erau evrei.

Iancu Jeny
Iancu Jeny

Cazul doamnei Iancu Jeny a fost subiectul unei anchete pe prima pagina a ziarul Evenimentul Zilei din 17.09.2018

click, pentru varianta online:

https://evz.ro/violonistul-stradivarius-canta-fals.html

varianta tiparita:

Emisiunea ” Vama Verde ” ( Partea I ), difuzată în data de 2 Iulie 2017 pe postul naţional de televiziune ” Nasul TV “!
Victima Sistemului Mafiot, domnul Nicolae Moldoveanu, alături de avocatii Adrian Cuculis şi Mădălin Penciu.

Astazi cu toate ca statul Roman a recunoscut aceasta trista perioada, exista persoane care ignora cu buna stiinta acest lucru si se dedau la fapte grave beneficiand de suportul unei grupari infractionale din care fac parte organe de politie, procurori, judecatori, executori, notari, banci, numitul Tomescu Alexandru, casa de avocatura Stoica si Asociatii si nu in ultimul rand adjunctul SIE generalul Dan Chiriac care comanda din umbra acest serial prin interpusi.

Dar sa revin la obiectul articolului.

Apartamentul este parte a unei frumoase vile situată vis-a-vis de Parcul Cișmigiu, parte din vila fiind proprietatea noastra de 2 camere la etaj, cealaltă jumătate aparținând pana in anul 2011 unei familii care a obtinut-o in urma unei revendicari.

grigore cobalcescu nr 13
str profesor Grigore Cobalcescu nr 13 sector 1 Bucuresti

Ulterior, această parte de vila a fost cumpărată in anul 2011 de numitul Alexandru Tomescu cu suma de 100.000 Euro, si cu alți 50.000 de Euro Alexandru Tomescu cumpăra și dreptul de a solicita despăgubiri de la stat respectiv A.N.R.P. (Autoritatea Naţională pentru Restituirea Proprietăţilor) Din cate am cunostinta acesta a cumparat aceasta parte de vila fara sa o vada.

Se pune intrebarea desigur cine cumpara o parte dintr-o vila de 100.000 Euro fara sa o vada? Cine da alti 50.000 euro pentru a primii despagubiri de la A.N.R.P.(Autoritatea Naţională pentru Restituirea Proprietăţilor)  fara sa aiba “terenul pregatit” si sa aiba siguranta ca in final va face ce isi doreste. In randurile urmatoare va voi oferii aceste raspunsuri.

De retinut ca Tomescu Alexandru nu face nici un demers pentru a obtine despagubirile de la A.N.R.P. (Autoritatea Naţională pentru Restituirea Proprietăţilor) asa cum are dreptul prin contract in schimb decide sa obtina aceste despagubiri de la familia noastra.

Astfel incepe in mod direct si prin interpusi o intreaga operatiune de teroare din care nu lipsesc activitati precum: oprirea utilitatilor prin manopere ilegale in complicitate cu Apa Nova s.a, GDF Suez, lucrari de constructie ilegale fara nici un fel de autorizatie prin care distrug in mod intentionat acoperisul casei noastre in plina iarna, distrugere, plangeri la politie solutionate cu N.U.P. ( Neinceperea Urmarii Penale) in favoarea noastra, numeroase notificari prin executori si actiuni in instanta numai de 6 procese pe care le-a si pierdut procese in care este reprezentat de casa de avocatura a dl Valeriu Stoica fostul ministru de justitie. De mentionat este faptul ca la fiecare proces aceasta casa de avocatura solicita instantei cheltuieli de judecata  de ordinul zecilor de milioane de lei vechi!

După ce Alexandru Tomescu a cumparat acest apartament am fost contactati de avocatul acestuia, Roșca Radu, care ne-a comunicat că dorește să se întâlnească noi, împreună cu domnul Tomescu.

La întâlnirea care a avut loc cei doi mi-au spus că doresc să cumpere apartamentul nostru , dar noi le-am comunicat ca nu dorim să vindem.

Ulterior am primit și o ofertă de 50.000 Euro pentru o cotă de teren de 159 mp și un apartament de 106 mp, în condițiile în care domnul Alexandru Tomescu deține o cotă de doar 84 mp pentru care a achitat 100.000 Euro, conform actului de vânzare-cumpărare.

Nu am răspuns la aceasta ofertă, iar ulterior cei doi au început o adevărată acțiune de șantaj și teroare judiciară, în sensul că, la scurt după ce am refuzat să vindem, numitul Tomescu, prin avocatul său, l-a contactat pe un prieten de-al meu din Israel cu intenția de a îl șantaja pe acesta și pe mine, și a ne obliga astfel să îi vindem casa la un pret de nimic. Intr-o discutie probata avocatul Rosca Radu recunoaste ca numitul Tomescu Alexandru l-a pus sa il sune pe prietenul meu in Israel si tot Tomescu a aflat nr acestuia de telefon din Israel de la presedintele F.C.E.R. (Federatia Comunitatilor Evreilor din Romania) dl. Aurel Vainer.

Prietenul meu a fost contactat si de Florina Rosca – Florina Neacsu in legatura cu aceeasi casa.

Urmare a refuzului nostru, în scurt timp apartamentul a fost INCENDIAT, I.S.U. (Inspectoratul pentru Situatii de Urgenta) București constatând intr-un proces verbal că focul a fost pus cu intenție. Sectia 3 nu a facut nici un fel de cercetare si nu m-a audiat niciodata, apartamentul nostru fiind incendiat in doar 1 an de 2 ori de fiecare data I.S.U. constatand ca si cauza focul pus cu intentie.

Primul incendiu – Proces verbal I.S.U. 29.07.2011

incendiu 1

Al doilea incendiu – Proces verbal I.S.U. 12.01.2013

incendiu 2

Interesant este faptul ca la a doua incendiere in prezenta unui politist de la Sectia 3 Politie mi s-a spus citez: “Sa le dea foc la toti jidanii ca o sa cumpere toata strada”, politistul aflat la fata locului a refuzat sa dea curs cererii mele de a il identifica pe cetateanul antisemit. La randul sau politistul a refuzat, contrar legislatiei in vigoare, sa se legitimeze sustinand ca el se legitimeaza doar in fata sefului de sectie. Din cate am inteles eu, politistul respectiv apartine Sectiei 3 Politie.

Cele 2 incendii au fost si subiectul emisiunii din data de 12.03.2018  la postul de televiziune NASUL TV, moderata de dl. avocatul Adrian Cuculis invitat jurnalistul. Eduard Ovidiu Ohanesian,

In ceea ce priveste cel de-al doilea incendiu Judecatoria Sectorului 1 Bucuresti s-a pronuntat deja in dosarul 5570/299/2018 si admis actiunea prin care s-a sesizat tergiversarea cercetarilor in dosarul 1274/P/2013 dosar in care seful Sectiei 3 Politie Scorteanu Petre comunica ca s-ar fi efectuat toate cercetarile posibile, instanta asa cum rezulta din acest extras ecris a fost de alta parere:

http://portal.just.ro/299/SitePages/Dosar.aspx?id_dosar=29900000000738755&id_inst=299

Asa a inceput Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu la adresa familie mele

Urmare a primului  incendiu pus cu intentie, (conform proces verbal I.S.U.) Alexandru Tomescu a început in data de 06.01.2013 să facă lucrări de construcție și reparații în lipsa oricarei autorizații, cu toate că se afla în zona protejată nr. 43. Pentru astfel de imobile, conform Legii 50/1991, este absolut necesară obținerea unei autorizații, chiar și pentru lucrări de reparație. Orice lucrare efectuată fără aceste documente este considerată infracțiune.

Am formulat o plângere pentru aceasta infracțiune, (constatata in aceeasi zi de chiar inspectorii primariei care au si dispus sistarea oricaror lucrarii pana la intrarea in legalitate), unde prin abuz și prin nerespectarea Codului de Procedură Penală, după formularea plângerii , nu am fost audiati niciodată, nu ni s-a dat dreptul să aducem martorii, să aducem probe, iar cand am solicitat răspunsul la Poliție și Parchet nu am primit nici un răspuns, ulterior am aflat că, în mod abuziv, s-a dispus neînceperea urmăririi penale de catre doamna procuror Beldie in dosarul 3309/P/2013 care nu considea ca un petent are dreptul sa isi probeze plangerea prin inscrisuri martori si nu are dreptul de a fi audiat in cauza.

Arat faptul ca urmare a acestor lucrari incepute nelegal in lipsa oricarei autorizari apartamentul nostru a fost lasat timp de 2 saptamani fara acoperis prada ploilor abundente, ninsorilor din acea perioada in acest moment ap fiind distrus in proportie de 90%.

Ne-am adresat celor de Inspectia in Constructii si urmare a pasivitatii acestei institutii am mers intr-o audienta la MDRAP (Ministerul Dezvoltarii Regionale si Administratiei Publice)  la secretarul de stat Iulian Matache la aceasta audienta fiind prezent si seful corpului de control pentru Inspectia in Constructii astfel a fost inregistrat memoriul cu nr. 86685/28.10.2013. La acest memoriu nu am primit raspuns nicioadata.

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu

Este important de mentionat ca la scurt timp de la incendierea si distrugerea acoperisului casei noastre printr-o  actiune de asa zisa repartie in lipsa oricarei autorizari , urmare a acestui abuz ne-am adresat domnului ministru al Dezvoltarii Regionale si Administratiei Publice  dl Liviu Dragnea (minister care are in subordine ISC – Inspectia e Stat in Constructii) acest domn a refuzat sa raspunda cererii noastre timp de 1 an de zile si la fel a refuzat sa raspunda cererii noastre de audienta formulate legal si intemeiat.

Nu este intamplator acest lucru deoarece in aceeasi perioda am fost contactat de finul dl Liviu Dragnea , dl Petre Gainescu fost angajat al USLA – actuala BRIGADA ANTITERO A SRI si acesta la modul cel mai direct posibil a inteles sa ne ameninte si intimideze spunand citez:

…”Liviu Dragnea este finul meu… oamenii cu care te lupti sunt foarte sus si ar fi bine sa nu mai faci atatea plangeri deoarece nu esti singur si mai ai aici si pe mama ta Iancu Jeny si pe fratele tau si e pacat sa aiba de suferit”…aceasta discutie poate fi probata.

Nu poate suna decat ca o ironie faptul ca acest domn Liviu Dragnea care intre timp a si fost condamnat si acesta a primit cea mai înaltă distincție a Congresului Evreiesc European, fara ca aceasta institutie sa verifice cu ce se ocupa acest domn si aceasta intreaga grupare infractionala in Romania,

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu continua

Coincidenta sau nu din momentul in care numitul Tomescu Alexandru ne-a devenit vecin in doar 6 (sase) luni am inregistrat 30.000 lei de plata la curent. Si 26.000 lei la apa, iar teava de la gaze ne-a fost taiata cu flexul. Sa fim intelesi nu suntem in povestile cu clanuri interlope care incearca sa ia cu japca o casa, vecinul meu se vrea un om de cultura, nu de canabis!

Astfel apa a fost oprita si ca o surpriza am aflat de la Apa Nova ca imputernicitul meu in relatia cu Apa Nova este avocatul Rosca Radu care in fapt este avocatul dl Tomescu eu nu imi aduc aminte sa il fi imputernicit!

Practic ne-au fost prezentate acte ce emana de la Apa Nova acte unde scrie negru pe alb in dreptul numele meu pe fisa de sistare Apa Nova ca am un avocat in persoana avocatului Rosca Radu.

Coincidenta sau nu, plangerea pentru fals si uz de fals a fost solutionata de doamna procuror Florina Lucan care concluzioneaza scurt “FAPTA NU EXISTA” Apa Nova se comporta ca un avocat al dl Tomescu si imi refuza in repetare randuri sa imi comunice informati la care am dreptul, astfel Apa Nova refuza sa imi comunice procesul verbal de sistare a apei, refuza sa imi comunice fisa de sistare , refuza sa imi comunice situatia platilor si nu in ultimul rand imi comunica chiar in instanta ca reprezentantul meu in relatia cu Apa Nova este avocatul Rosca Radu care este imputernicitul lui Alexandru Tomescu (precizez ca cei doi nu au nici un contract cu Apa Nova)

La fel Apa Nova pentru a acoperi abuzurile dl Tomescu trimite acte false catre mine printr- un birou de mediere (Ardeleanu si Asociatii) practic primim o invitatie la mediere cu confirmare de primire care deja era semnata de primire dar desigur de catre altcineva , am sesizat Politia dar nu ma mira ca si aceasta plangere zace undeva intr-un sertar de peste 1 an de zile. Interesant este si faptul ca acest plic imi este adus sambata cand nu primim deloc posta si nu este adusa de postasul care il cunoastem de peste 10 ani ci de un postas care nu l am vazut niciodata.

In aceeasi maniera dupa solutionarea procesului cu Apa Nova in la judecatoria Sectorului 1 Bucuresti , acest dosar 33633/299/2014 DISPARE pur si simplu din arhiva acestei judecatori singurul lucru care imi este remis de aceasta instanta fiind un raspuns SEC din care rezulta ca acest dosar nu mai poate fi gasit!!! NU este de mirare ca acest lucru s-a intamplat exact dupa ce Apa Nova a depus odata cu conluzile scrise un document falsificat fata de care am intentionam sa ne inscriem in fals, prin disparitia acestui dosar acest fals nu mai poate fi cercetat.

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu

Cu toate ca in ceea ce priveste gazele am reusit sa castigam in mod irevocabil un proces acestia in mod abuziv refuza sa ne rebranseze dupa ce bransamentul nostru platit de noi in urma cu mai bine de 10 ani a fost preluat abuziv de Alexandru Tomescu. Chiar si la solicitarea expresa la ANPC de a ne rebransa GDF Suez refuza sa fac acest lucru.

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu

In anul 2012 Tomescu Tomescu Alexandru promoveaza o actiune prin care revendica ap. nostru in dosarul 52217/299/2012 actiune respinsa de instanta ca neintemeiata atat la fond la Judecatoria Sectorului 1 Bucuresti cat si la apel la Tribunalul Bucuresti unde numitul Tomescu Alexandru a fost reprezentat in instanta chiar de dl Valeriu Stoica care prin pledoaria sa daca se poate numii asa a starnit rasul salii.

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu

Tomescu Alexandru promoveaza doua actiuni in instanta (19061/299/2013 si 19072/299/2013) unde solicita evacuarea noastra, cu toate ca nu detinea nici un titlu asupra apartamentului nostru ambele actiuni fiind la fel respinse ca neintemeiate si raman irevocabile prin neexercitarea nici unei cai de atac.

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu

Ca urmare Alexandru Tomescu formuleaza in mod abuziv o plangere la politie unde reclama lipsa de folosinta in dosarul nr 17971/P/2013 dosar care in urma cercetarilor este solutionat cu N.U.P. deoacere acesta nu face dovada celor sustinute in mod fals in plangere.

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu continua

Ca urmare a faptului ca a pierdut procesele anterioare si nu a putut obtine gratis casa noastra si nici nu am cedat amenintarilor, santajului si terorii judiciare instituite de acesta Tomescu Alexandru cumpara o creanta (autentificata la BIN Alexandra Liuba Liliana sub nr. 551/28.10.2014) a mea de la Banca Transilvania si o pune in mod nelegal in executare astfel in dosarele 32504/301/2014 si 25536/299/2014 instantele resping actiunea executare silita ca neintemeiata. Contractul de cesiune fiind redactat doar intr-un singur exemplar,(nu  este comunicat asa cum prevad si partile in acest contract in mod nelegal) si contine mai multe formulari ce contravin legislatiei in vigoare.

In ceea ce priveste contractul de cesiune de creanta cu nr. 551/28.10.2014 autentificat la BIN Alexandra Liuba Liliana arat faptul ca numita Alexandra Liuba Liliana este deja trimisa in judecata alaturi de mai multi inculpati in dosarul nr. 6632/2/2013/a10 – dosarul Bancherilor BRD pentru infractiunile de iniţiere, constituire de grup infracţional organizat, aderare sau sprijinire a unui asemenea grup (Legea 39/2003 art. 7), aceasta find cea care a realizat si actele pentru tranzactile cu terenuri de la Nana.

Interviu la Radio International Deutschland din data de 21.02.2017 unde se vorbeste despre implicarea S.R.I. in actiunile nelegale ale dl Tomescu Alexandru de a dobandi aceasta proprietate.

Urmare a acestor fapte care le-am povestit dl. Radu Fatulescu membru PNL,  a publicat o ancheta jurnalistica. Urmare a publicarii acestei anchete a fost amenintat in sediul P.N.L. Sector 2 la initiativa adjunctului SIE generalul Dan Chiriac (atasez in acest sens interviul oferit doamnei Bianca Nae, la postul de televiziune Antena 3.)

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu continua

Tomescu Alexandru incearca din nou sa puna in executare creanta de la Banca Transilvania in dosarul 39966/299/2014 si aici in mod nelegal instanta incuvinteaza executare silita (de retinut ca toate cele 3 dosare de executare silita au aceleasi parti , obiect, continut de acte si sentinte diferite! dosarele 32504/301/2014 ; 25536/299/2014 si 39966/299/2014) deci este imposibil sa existe 3 dosare cu aceleasi parti, aceeasi cauza, si aceleasi continut de acte dar cu sentinte diferite!

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu continua

Am solicitat suspendare executarii pana la solutionarea contestatiei la executare. Prin incheierea de sedinta din dosarul 46766/299/2014 executarea in dosarul 39966/299/2014 este suspendata.

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu continua

Am formulat o contestatie la executare care a fost solutionata prin respingerea ei ca neintemeiata in conditile in care a fost solutionata fara ca dosarul prin care s-a incuvintat executare sa fie atasat asa cum prevede legea (dosar 45288/299/2014) astefl dosarul care il contestatm (39966/299/2014) nu s-a aflat pe masa judecatorului in momentul pronuntarii sentintei.

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu continua

De la aceasta data cu toate ca decizia nu este una definitiva si executarea este suspendata in mod nelegal numitul Tomescu prin BEJ Somildoc Paula Daniela face tot posibilul pentru a o da afara din casa pe mama mea Iancu Jeny care este si victima a holocaustului

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu continua

In pararel cu aceste actiuni aceasta grupare infractionala trimite la inaintare firma Baby spa a domnului  Dan Stroe fost director de achitizitii al ANAF (care a fost prins cu 600.000. euro cash in seif) , firma care prin intermediul directoarei Anca Grecu incearca fara succes sa imi insceneze un dosar de evaziune fiscala.

Intermediarul acestei tranzactii este nimeni altul decat Cornel Bortan patronul firmei Bacos care anterior a mai incercat acest lucru prin firma Alpha Rochas din aeroportul Otopeni si prin firma de consultanta Soter s.a.

Nu am dat curs acestei provocari insa dl Cornel Bortan nu se lasa si imi solicita in mod inexplicabil sa i fac un contract de inchiriere pentru exact vila mult ravnita de dl Tomescu Alexandru, evident refuz.

La scurt timp apare din acest neant nimeni alta decat Magda Stroe directorul adjunct al I.C.R. Londra (Institutul Cultural Roman) care incearca si ea acelasi lucru ca si ceilalti sa insceneze un dosar de evaziune la scurt timp dupa refuzul meu de a lucra cu I.C.R. Londra toate contactele mele online cu I.C.R. Londra sunt blocate in conditile in care anterior acestui refuz eram catalogat de chiar doamna Magda Stroe ca …“un artist de TOP”…

De remarcat cercul strans al acestora spun asta deoarece dupa ce generalul SIE Dan Chiriac a fost obligat sa paraseasca S.U.A. in 1990 si a gasit un loc caldut la Ambasada Romaniei de la Londra. (conform biografiei publice a acestuia).

M-am adresat si cu o solicitare de a fi primit intr-o audienta si dl .presedinte Aurel Vainer unde am crezut ( in naivitatea mea) ca voi primii sprjin si consiliere.

Astfel in data de 23.04.2014 am facut o cerere de a fi primiti in audienta impreuna cu mama mea.

La aceasta cerere nu am primit nici un fel de raspuns timp de 6 luni si incercarea mea a primi un rapsuns a primit reactii dure, chiar partea consilierului dl presedinte Aurel Vainer , dl Silvian Horn caruia i-am solicitat in cadrul unei intrevederi la sediul F.C.E.R. (Federatia Comunitatilor Evreilor din Romania) sa imi comunice care este motivul pentru care imi este refuzata aceasta audienta. Raspunsul m-a uluit pe mine si pe mama mea citez “daca mai insistati chem paza si va dau afara” amenintare facuta in prezenta celor doua secretare ale F.C.E.R. Asa inteleg mai marii acesti comunitati sa conduca si reprezinte pe noi putinii care am mai ramas. Dl Silvian Horn avea si motive sa faca acest gest deoarece anterior ca acest POGROM sa inceapa o persoana din anturajul numitului Tomescu a facut demersuri la F.C.E.R. pentru a afla daca casa mea este in grija F.C.E.R. in baza unui contract. Acest lucru fiind confirmat de dl Horn intr–o discutie avuta discutie care o pot proba, ulterior cand dl Silvian Horn a vazut ca pe acest aspect vin si solicit o audienta si lucrurile se complica a negat aceasta discutie.

Dupa 6 luni urmare a unor demersuri am fost primit in audienta la dl presedinte Aurel Vainer ocazie cu care i-am explicat acestuia problemele cu care eu si familia mea ne confruntam si am depus la biroul acestuia o solicitare pentru a face in numele nostru demersuri la Comisia de Abuzuri, Comisia Juridica si Comisia de Apararare de la Parlament. Acesta m-a asigurat ca va face acest lucru.

Astazi la 1 an si 2 luni de la aceasta intalnire nu am primit nici un raspuns cu toate ca am solicitat in scris acest lucru de 3 ori.

Telefonic si verbal la sediul F.C.E.R. (Federatia Comunitatilor Evreilor din Romania) dl Vexler pe un ton arogant si batjocoritor mi-a spus ca aceste demersuri nu se pot face oficial si ca nu exista nr de inregistare la cele 3 dosare care le-am depus pentru cele 3 comisii si ca problema mea nu e de competenta F.C.E.R. (Federatia Comunitatilor Evreilor din Romania) Numai vorbesc de comportamentul grobian , lipsit de respect si jignitor al paznicilor de la sediul F.C.E.R  care de cand am formulat aceste cereri au comportament abuziv. La ultima deplasare la sediul F.C.E.R. chiar in prezenta dl Vexler paznicii ne-au agresat verbal si ne-au interzis accesul in conditile in care de fata era chiar dl Vexler care a spus ca nu e problema lui ca cei de la paza ( paza platita si din contribuitia noastra) nu ne dau voie sa intram in sediul F.C.E.R. Desigur ma intreba de ce aceasta organizatie se mai cheama Comunitatea Evreilor deoarece nu are nici o legatura cu membrii sai?

Mentionez ca familia noastra a facut si demersuri la C.N.C.D. ( Consiliul National pentru Combaterea Discriminarii)  unde am constatat ca in opinia doamnei secretar de stat dr. Gheorghiu Luminita astfel de manisfestari, abuzuri si incalcari ale legii sunt doar un simplu mod in care oamenii isi pot exprima in mod liber opinia!

Desigur ma intreb?

Pogromul violonistului Alexandru Tomescu mai continua?

Revenim cu un update: raspunsul este da!

Pe data de 08.02.2016 Ambasadorul BUNAVOINTEI Tomescu Alexandru prin BEJ Paula Somildoc va scoate ap. de 2 camere de la etaj la vanzare pentru suma modica de: 15.000. euro scriu si in litere ca sa nu creada cineva ca este o confuzie: cincisprezece mii euro.

Licitatatie care a avut loc deja Tomescu Alexandru fiind singurul participant la aceasta licitatie trucata!

Pentru ca asa cum a spus in instanta prin casa de avocatura Stoica si Asociatii, “…clientul nostru numai poate astepta are nevoie de bani”…in conditile in care Tomescu Alexandru nu este titularul acestei creante ci banca de la care a cumparat creanta special in acest scop – BTR , banca care nu a incercat niciodata sa scoata la vanzare acest apartament pentru aceasta suma modica. Numai vorbesc de faptul ca a cumparat aceasta creanta cu 7500 de Euro pentru a o pune in executare cu 15.000 de Euro si dobanda de 38 % , un adevarat AMBASADOR al BUNAVOINTEI!

La o simpla cautare pe internet am observat ca este un modus operandi la Ambasadorul Bunavointei Tomescu Alexandru de a participa singur la licitatii, concursuri etc, in acelasi mod acesta a obtinut si vioara Stradivarii in urma unui concurs la care a fost singurul participant asa cum rezulta si din acest material:

Update 17.02.2016:

Astazi 17.02.2016 Judecatoria Sectorului 1 Bucuresti a admis actiunea noastra impotriva ordonantelor Parchetului de pe langa Judecatoria Sectorului 1 Bucuresti, citez:
Solutia pe scurt: În baza art. 341 alin(6) lit. b C.proc.pen., admite plângerea formulată de petentul MOLDOVEANU NICOLAE. Desfiinţează soluţia de clasare dispusă prin Ordonanţa nr. 14008/P/2013 din data de 23.07.2015 şi menţinută prin Ordonanţa nr. 2083/ll-2/2015 din data de 14.09.2015 ale Parchetului de pe lângă Judecătoria Sectorului 1 Bucureşti. Trimite cauza la Parchetul de pe lângă Judecătoria Sectorului 1 Bucureşti, în vederea completării urmăririi penale, sub aspectul săvârşirii infracţiunilor prevăzute de art. 193 alin(2) din Legea nr. 123/2012, cu aplicarea art. 5 C.pen. şi art. 228-229 alin(3) C.pen. cu aplicarea art. 5 C.pen., cu aplicarea art. 38 C.pen. În baza art. 276 alin(1) C.proc.pen., respinge cererea de acordare a cheltuielilor judiciare, formulată de intimatul Tomescu Alexandru, ca neîntemeiată. În baza art. 275 alin(3) C.proc.pen., cheltuielile judiciare rămân în sarcina Statului. Definitivă. Pronunţată în şedinţa din camera de consiliu, azi, 17.02.2016.
Document: Încheiere finală (dezinvestire) 17.02.2016

Actiunea il are ca intimat pe Tomescu Alexandru care este cercetat pentru bransare ilegala la gaze furt si furt calificat de gaze la adresa str Grigore Cobalcescu nr 13 adresa de la care doreste sa o evacueze fortat pe doamna Iancu Jeny si familia ei.

Practic ap de la parter proprietatea numitului Tomescu Alexandru era bransat la teava noastra de gaze care era la etaj in lipsa oricarei autorizari, contract si acord al nostru asa cum prevede legea.

solutie portal instanta dosar 101795/299/2015

Decizia Judecatoriei Sectorului 1 Bucuresti privind bransarea ilegala a lui Tomescu Alexandru la bransamentul nostru de gaze, a fost preluata de ziarul Puterea:

puterea gaze

Va puteti arata suportul fata de aceasta cauza aici:

alexandru tomescu
cauza

Va puteti arata suportul si pe acest grup de sustinere:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/736709933126476/

group
grup sustinere

acest caz este si subiectul unei anchete a ziarului Puterea :

puterea online tomescu

http://www.puterea24.ro/social/ambasadorul-bunavointei-violonistul-alexandru-tomescu-a-declansat-razboiul-imobiliar-cu-tenta-antisemita-128959.html

primul articol aparut in ziarul Criteriul National in data de 27.07.20176

http://www.criteriul.ro/pogromul-si-fata-nevazuta-a-violonistului-alexandru-tomescu/

al doilea articol aparaut in ziarul Criteriul National in data de 17.03.2017

https://www.criteriul.ro/progromul-impotriva-domnului-nicolae-moldoveanu-si-a-mamei-domniei-sale-continua/

si de cotidianul Flux24.ro articol din data de 03.04.2017

Ancheta dl Adrian Radu fost ofiter SRI, in publicatia Incisiv de Prahova din data de 26.04.2017

https://www.incisivdeprahova.ro/2017/04/26/mafia-cu-parfum-de-sriincitari-la-ura-de-rasa-poate-procurorul-general-al-romaniei-are-un-punct-de-vedere-in-acest-caz-mai-ales-ca-a-fost-sesizat-oficial/

Interviu la INTERNATIONAL RADIO DEUTSCHLAND din data de 27 04 2017 unde la minutul 14.31 se mentioneaza ca autorul articolului din ziarul Incisiv de Prahova , dl Adrian Radu a fost amenintat si intimidat sa nu mai faca anchete jurnalistice pe acest subiect, la fel moderatorul postului de radio INTERNATIONAL RADIO DEUTSCHLAND dl Alex Oprea  confirma ca si acesta a fost amenintat si intimidat dupa ce a facut emisiuni pe acelasi subiect.

 

La aceste infractiuni si a adus aportul si firma RCS-RDS care a instalat in biroul meu un modem modificat cu trafic nelimitat in SRI si DNA

Sesizati telefonic si in scris firma RCS – RDS nu recunoaste prezenta la biroul meu a unei echipe RDS sosita la biroul meu cu o masina inscriptionata RDS pentru a face un asa zis “UPGRADE”

Rds

din articolul de mai jos reiese ca Tomescu Alexandru este membru in masonerie in Marea Loja Naţională din România (MLNR) http://jurnalul.ro/stire-special/aniversarea-masoneriei-albastre-in-epoca-flacarii-violet-533604.html

Articol publicat de canalul media Israel 411

In anul 2021 la adresa str Grigore Cobalcescu nr 13 in baza unui contract de “comodat” Tomescu Alexandru a oferit casa catre fundatia Magic Home fundatie care il are ca fondator pe fostul ministru al sanatatii Vlad Voiculescu

magic home
magic home

for english version click here

Termeni si conditii

Pogromul si Fața nevăzută a violonistului Alexandru Tomescu-

The Pogrom and the dark side of the GOODWILL Ambassador violonist Alexandru Tomescu

Published on February 19, 2014, by gicacontra, an article about abuses that are still being committed up to the present day, 2026:

The Pogrom and the Hidden Face of the Violinist Alexandru Tomescu

All the abuses described above were committed so that the apartment in which Mrs. Iancu Jeny, a Holocaust victim in Romania and survivor of the Holocaust in Romania, lived would come into the ownership of the violinist Alexandru Tomescu and be used by the Magic Home Foundation of the former Minister of Health from the USR party, Vlad Voiculescu, and current advisor to the President of Romania, Nicușor Dan.

for romanian version click here

If, in the times of sad memory, Jews were exterminated to the music of Wagner, a Jewish family, which includes a Holocaust victim from Romania, is forcibly evacuated to the music of Bach! by the violinist Alexandru Tomescu.

alexandru tomescu str. grigore cobalcescu nr 13 Bucuresti
Iancu Jeny – str. Grigore Cobalcescu nr 13 Bucuresti – Alexandru Tomescu

The pogrom of the violinist Alexandru Tomescu begins by stating that my mother, Iancu Jeny, is trying to live in the much-desired house without any legal rights to do so according to the so-called Tomescu Alexandru

Mrs. Iancu Jeny, a Holocaust victim and member of AERVH (The Association of Jews in Romania, Victims of the Holocaust), is not encountering this sad situation for the first time. The Romanian state sent this family to the street in the 1940s simply because they were Jews.

Iancu Jeny
Iancu Jeny

This case of Mrs. Iancu Jeny was the subject of a major journalistic inquiry on the first page of a major newspaper in Romania, Evenimentul Zilei on 17.09.2018

online version:

https://evz.ro/violonistul-stradivarius-canta-fals.html

printed version:

The TV show “Vama Verde” (Part I), broadcast on July 2, 2017, on the national television channel ‘Nasul TV’! The victim of the Mafia System, Mr. Nicolae Moldoveanu, alongside lawyers Adrian Cuculis and and Mădălin Penciu.

Today, even though the Romanian state has acknowledged this sad period, there are people who knowingly ignore this fact and engage in serious actions, benefiting from the support of a criminal group, which includes police officers, prosecutors, judges, bailiffs, notaries, banks, the so-called Tomescu Alexandru, the law firm Stoica si Asociatii , and last but not least S.I.E. deputy command General Dan Chiriac , who commands this series from the shadows, though his intermediaries

But let me return to the subject of the article.

The apartment is part of a beautiful villa located across from Cișmigiu Park, part of the villa being our 2-room apartment on the upper floor, the other half belonging until 2011 to a family who obtained it following a claim

grigore cobalcescu nr 13
13 – Grigore Cobalcescu street, Bucharest

Subsequently, this part of the villa was purchased in 2011 by the so-called Alexandru Tomescu for the sum of 100,000 Euros, and with an additional 50,000 Euros, Alexandru Tomescu also bought the right to request compensation from the state, specifically from A.N.R.P. (National Authority for Property Restitution). As far as I know, he bought this part of the villa without even seeing it.

The question arises, of course, who buys a part of a villa for 100,000 Euros without seeing it? Who gives another 50,000 Euros to receive compensation from A.N.R.P. (National Authority for Property Restitution) without having ‘the ground prepared’ and without the certainty that, in the end, they will do what they want? In the following lines, I will provide the answers to these questions.

It should be noted that Alexandru Tomescu does not make any efforts to obtain the compensation from A.N.R.P. (National Authority for Property Restitution), as he is entitled to by contract. Instead, he decides to obtain this compensation from our family.

Thus, he directly and through intermediaries begins a whole operation of terror, which includes illegal activities such as: stopping utilities through illegal actions in complicity with Apa Nova S.A., GDF Suez, illegal construction works without any kind of authorization, which intentionally destroy the roof of our house in the middle of winter, destruction, police complaints solved with N.U.P. (Non-Starting of Criminal Prosecution) in our favor, numerous notifications through bailiffs, and court actions, including 6 lawsuits that he lost. In these lawsuits, he was represented by the law firm of Mr. Valeriu Stoica, the former Minister of Justice. It is worth mentioning that in every trial, this law firm requests the court to charge judicial expenses amounting to tens of millions of old Romanian lei!

After Alexandru Tomescu bought this apartment, we were contacted by his lawyer Radu Rosca , who informed us that he wanted to meet with us, together with Mr. Tomescu.

At the meeting, the two of them told me that they wanted to buy our apartment, but we informed them that we did not wish to sell.

Later, we received an offer of 50,000 Euros for a land share of 159 square meters and an apartment of 106 square meters, while Mr. Alexandru Tomescu owns only a share of 84 square meters for which he paid 100,000 Euros, according to the sales contract.

I replied to this offer, and later the two of them began a real act of blackmail and judicial terror, in the sense that, shortly after we refused to sell, the so-called Tomescu, through his lawyer, contacted a friend of mine from Israel with the intention of blackmailing both him and me, and thus forcing us to sell him the house at a ridiculously low price. In a recorded conversation, lawyer Radu Rosca admits that the so-called Tomescu Alexandru instructed him to call my friend in Israel, and Tomescu obtained his phone number from the president of F.C.E.R. (Federation of Jewish Communities in Romania), Mr. Aurel Vainer.

My friend was also contacted by Florina Roșca – Florina Neacșu regarding the same house.

Following our refusal, shortly after, the apartment was SET ON FIRE. I.S.U. (Inspectorate for Emergency Situations) Bucharest found in an official report that the fire was set intentionally. Section 3 did not conduct any investigation and never heard my testimony, with our apartment being set on fire twice in just one year, with I.S.U. confirming that the cause was intentional arson each time.

 

First fire/arson – I.S.U. official report 29.07.2011

incendiu 1

Second fire/arson – I.S.U. official report 12.01.2013

incendiu 2

It is interesting that during the second act of arson, in the presence of a police officer from Police Station 3, I was told, I quote: “Let them burn all the Jews, because they will buy the whole street.”

The police officer present at the scene refused to comply with my request to identify the antisemitic individual. In turn, the police officer also refused, contrary to the legislation in force, to identify himself, claiming that he only identifies himself in front of the head of the station. As far as I understand, that officer belongs to Police Station 3.

The two arson incidents were also the subject of the broadcast on 12.03.2018 on the TV channel NASUL TV, hosted by lawyer Adrian Cuculis, with journalist Eduard Ovidiu Ohanesian,

Regarding the second fire, the Court of Sector 1 Bucharest has already ruled in case number 5570/299/2018 and accepted the action that raised concerns about the delay in the investigation in case 1274/P/2013, in which the head of Section 3 Police, Scorteanu Petre, communicated that all possible investigations had been carried out. However, as the court’s written extract shows, the court had a different opinion:

This is how violinist Tomescu Alexandru ’s pogrome against my family started

The pogrom of violinist Alexandru Tomescu against my family begins
Following the first intentionally set fire (according to the I.S.U. official report), Alexandru Tomescu started construction and repair works on January 6, 2013, without any authorization, even though the property was located in a protected area (area number 43). For such properties, according to Law 50/1991, obtaining an authorization is absolutely necessary, even for repair works. Any work carried out without these documents is considered a criminal offense.

I filed a complaint for this offense (which was identified on the same day by the inspectors of the municipality, who also ordered the cessation of any work until the legality was established). After filing the complaint, due to abuse and disregard for the Code of Criminal Procedure, we were never heard, we were not given the right to bring witnesses or evidence, and when we requested a response from the police and the prosecutor’s office, we received no answer. Later, we found out that, abusively, the prosecution did not start a criminal investigation, as ordered by Prosecutor Beldie in case number 3309/P/2013, who did not consider that a complainant has the right to prove their complaint through documents and witnesses and does not have the right to be heard in the case.

I want to point out that as a result of these illegal works, carried out without any authorization, our apartment was left without a roof for two weeks, exposed to heavy rains and snowstorms at that time, causing the apartment to be destroyed by 90%.

We addressed the Construction Inspection, and due to the passivity of this institution, we went to a meeting at MDRAP (Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration) with Secretary of State Iulian Matache, where the head of the control body for the Construction Inspection was also present. The petition was registered with number 86685/28.10.2013. We never received any response to this petition.

Violinist Alexandru Tomescu actions continues:

It is important to mention that shortly after the arson and destruction of our house’s roof through an alleged repartition, without any authorization, as a result of this abuse, we addressed the Minister of Regional Development and Public Administration Mr Liviu Dragnea Mr. Liviu Dragnea (the ministry that oversees) ISC – State Construction Inspection ) This gentleman refused to respond to our request for one year, and similarly, he refused to respond to our legally and properly formulated request for a meeting.

This is not a coincidence, as during the same period I was contacted by Mr. Liviu Dragnea’s godson, Mr. Petre Găineascu, a former employee of USLA – now the  ANTITERRORISM BRIGADE OF THE ROMANIAN INTELLIGENCE SERVICE  In the most direct way possible, he understood it was his task to threaten and intimidate us, saying, and I quote:

…”Liviu Dragnea is my godfather… the people you are fighting are very high up, and it would be better if you stopped making so many complaints because you are not alone, and you still have your mother, Iancu Jeny, and your brother here, and it’s a pity for them to suffer”… this conversation can be proven.

It can only sound like irony that Mr. Liviu Dragnea, who has since been convicted also who received the highest distinction of the European Jewish Congress, without this institution verifying what this gentleman and his entire criminal group are involved in in Romania.

The pogrom of violinist Alexandru Tomescu continues:

Coincidence or not, from the moment Mr. Alexandru Tomescu became our neighbor, in just 6 (six) months, we registered 30,000 lei in electricity bills and 26,000 lei in water bills, and the gas pipe was cut with a grinder. To be clear, we are not in the stories of criminal gangs trying to forcefully take a house; my neighbor wants to be seen as a cultured man, not someone dealing in cannabis!

In practice, we were presented with documents from Apa Nova, where it is clearly stated on the water shut-off notice that my lawyer is  lawyer Rosca Radu, who is actually Mr. Tomescu’s lawyer. I do not remember ever authorizing him!

Technically, we were presented documents issued by Apa Nova, where it is written very clearly, next to my name, on the Apa Nova chart of interruption of supplies, that I have a lawyer, in the person of lawyer Rosca Radu.

Coincidence or not, the complaint for forgery and use of forged documents was handled by Prosecutor Florina Lucan, who briefly concluded: “THE FACT DOES NOT EXIST.” Apa Nova behaves like Mr. Tomescu’s lawyer and repeatedly refuses to provide me with information to which I am entitled. Thus, Apa Nova refuses to provide me with the water shut-off report, refuses to provide me with the shut-off notice, refuses to provide me with the payment history, and, last but not least, even communicated to me in court that my representative in dealings with Apa Nova is lawyer lawyer Rosca Radu, who is Mr. Alexandru Tomescu’s authorized representative (I note that the two have no contract with Apa Nova).

Similarly, Apa Nova, to cover up Mr. Tomescu’s abuses, sends false documents to me through a mediation office (Ardeleanu and Associates). In practice, I received an invitation to mediation with an acknowledgment of receipt that was already signed, but, of course, by someone else. I reported this to the police, but it doesn’t surprise me that this complaint has been sitting in a drawer for over a year. What’s also interesting is that this envelope was delivered to me on a Saturday, when we don’t receive any mail, and it wasn’t delivered by our regular mailman, whom we’ve known for over 10 years, but by a mailman I had never seen before.
In the same manner, after the resolution of the case with Apa Nova at the Court of Sector 1 Bucharest, this case file 33633/299/2014 simply disappears from the archives of this court. The only thing I received from this court was a SEC response stating that this file can no longer be found!!! It is not surprising that this happened right after Apa Nova submitted a falsified document together with written conclusions, a document against which we intended to file a charge for forgery. With the disappearance of this file, the forgery can no longer be investigated

The pogrom of violinist Alexandru Tomescu

Although we managed to win a case definitively regarding the gas supply, they abusively refuse to reconnect us, even though our gas connection, which we paid for more than 10 years ago, was taken abusively by Alexandru Tomescu. Even at the express request to A.N.P.C. (National Authority for Consumer Protection), G.D.F. Suez refuses to do this.

Violinist Alexandru Tomescu actions continues:

In 2012, Alexandru Tomescu initiated an action claiming our apartment in case number file  52217/299/2012, an action dismissed by the court as unfounded, both at first instance at the First Instance Court of District 1 of Bucharest, and on appeal, at the Bucharest Law Court, where Mr. Alexandru Tomescu was represented in court by Mr. Valeriu Stoica, whose pleading, if it can be called that, caused the courtroom to laugh.

Valeriu Stoica is the former minister of justice in Romania

The pogrom of violinist Alexandru Tomescu:

Alexandru Tomescu initiated two actions in court (19061/299/2013 and 19072/299/2013), where he requested our eviction, despite not having any title to our apartment. Both actions were dismissed as unfounded and became irrevocable due to the lack of any appeal being filed.

The pogrom of violinist Alexandru Tomescu:

As a result, Alexandru Tomescu abusively filed a complaint with the police, claiming lack of utility in case number 17971/P/2013, a case that was closed with N.U.P. (No Penal Proceedings) because he failed to provide proof of the false claims made in his complaint.

The pogrom of violinist Alexandru Tomescu:

Consequently, Alexandru Tomescu abusively files a complaint to the police, where he alleges the lack of use in file no. 17971/P/2013, a file which, following investigations, is settled with N.U.P., because it does not provide evidence to support the false allegations written in the complaint.

The pogrom of violinist Alexandru Tomescu:

As a result of losing the previous lawsuits and being unable to obtain our house for free, and since we did not yield to his threats, blackmail, and judicial terror, Alexandru Tomescu bought a claim (authenticated by notary BIN Alexandra Liuba Liliana under number 551/28.10.2014) from Banca Transilvania and illegally initiated enforcement proceedings. In cases 32504/301/2014 and 25536/299/2014. the courts rejected the enforcement action as unfounded. The assignment contract was drafted in only one copy (it was not communicated as stipulated by the parties in the contract, in an illegal manner) and contains several provisions that contravene the legislation in force.

Regarding the claim assignment contract with number 551/28.10.2014 authenticated by notary BIN Alexandra Liuba Liliana, I point out that Ms. Alexandra Liuba Liliana has already been sent to court along with several other defendants in case number 6632/2/2013/a10 – file of BRD bankers for crimes such as the initiation and formation of an organized criminal group, joining or supporting such a group (Law 39/2003, article 7), and she is the one who executed the documents for the land transactions of Nana.

Interview on Radio International Deutschland on February 21, 2017, where the involvement of the S.R.I. (Romanian Intelligence Service) in Mr. Alexandru Tomescu’s illegal actions to acquire this property is discussed

Following these actions that I have described, Mr. Radu Fătulescu, a member of the PNL (National Liberal Party), published a journalistic investigation. As a result of the publication of this investigation, he was threatened at office of the National Liberal Party sector 2 at the initiative of the deputy of the Foreign Intelligence Service, general Dan Chiriac

(I attach in this regard the interview given to Mrs. Bianca Nae, on Antena 3 TV station).

The Pogrom of Violinist Alexandru Tomescu Continues:

Alexandru Tomescu is once again trying to enforce a debt from Banca Transilvania in case 39966/299/2014 aand here, illegally, the court allows forced execution (it should be noted that all three enforcement cases have the same parties, object, content of documents, and different rulings! The cases 32504/301/2014; 25536/299/2014 and 39966/299/2014); It is therefore impossible for there to be three cases with the same parties, same cause, and same content of documents but with different rulings!

The Pogrom of Violinist Alexandru Tomescu Continues:

I requested the suspension of the enforcement until the resolution of the contestation to the enforcement. Through the court order in case 46766/299/2014, the enforcement in case 39966/299/2014 is suspended.

The Pogrom of Violinist Alexandru Tomescu Continues:

I filed a contestation to the enforcement, which was rejected as unfounded, even though it was resolved without attaching the file through which the enforcement was authorized, as the law requires (case 45288/299/2014). Therefore, the file that we contested 39966/299/2014 was not on the judge’s desk when the ruling was pronounced.

The Pogrom of Violinist Alexandru Tomescu Continues:

Since then, even though the decision is not final and the enforcement is suspended illegally, the aforementioned Tomescu, through the bailiff Paula Daniela Somildoc, is doing everything possible to evict my mother, Iancu Jeny, who is also a victim of the Holocaust.

The Pogrom of Violinist Alexandru Tomescu Continues:

In parallel with these actions, this criminal group sends forward Mr. Dan Stroe’s company, Baby spa owned by Mr. Dan Stroe, former procurement manager of the National Tax Administration Authority (who was caught with 600,000 Euro cash in his safe box) , who was caught with €600,000 in cash in a safe). This company, through its director Anca Grecu, is unsuccessfully trying to frame me with a tax evasion case.

The intermediary of this transaction is none other than Cornel Bortan, tthe owner of the Bacos company, who previously tried the same thing through Alpha Rochas at Otopeni Airport and through the consulting firm Soter s.a.

I did not engage in this provocation, but Mr. Cornel Bortan did not give up and inexplicably requested that I create a lease agreement for the very villa that Mr. Tomescu Alexandru covets, which I obviously refused.

Shortly after, out of nowhere, none other than Magda Stroe, the deputy manager of I.C.R. London (Romanian Cultural Institute)

appears, attempting the same thing as the others, trying to frame me with a tax evasion case. Shortly after my refusal to work with I.C.R. London, all my online contacts with I.C.R. London were blocked, although before this refusal, I was considered by Ms. Magda Stroe as… “a top artist”…

Notably, these people form a close circle. I say this because after general Dan Chiriac of the Foreign Intelligence service was forced to leave the USA in 1990, he found a cushy position at the Romanian Embassy in London (according to his public biography).

I also addressed a request to be received for an audience with Chairman Aurel Vainer, where I naively believed I would receive support and advice.

Thus, on April 23, 2014, I made a request to be received for an audience, along with my mother.

I did not receive any response to this request for six months, and my attempt to get a response met with harsh reactions, even from Silvian Horn, the advisor to Mr. President Aurel Vainer. I had requested, during a meeting at the F.C.E.R. (Federation of Jewish Communities of Romania), headquarters, to be informed of the reason for my audience refusal. His response stunned both me and my mother; he said, and I quote, “If you insist, I’ll call security and have you thrown out,” a threat made in the presence of two secretaries at F.C.E.R. This is how the higher-ups in these communities understand to lead and represent us, the few who remain. Mr. Silvian Horn had reasons to make this gesture because, before this pogrom began, someone from Tomescu’s entourage had inquired with F.C.E.R. to find out if my house was under F.C.E.R.’s care based on a contract. This was confirmed by Mr. Horn in a discussion that I can prove. Later, when Mr. Silvian Horn saw that I was requesting an audience on this matter and things were getting complicated, he denied this conversation.

After six months, as a result of further efforts, I was received in an audience with Mr. Chairman Aurel Vainer,During this meeting, I explained to him the problems that my family and I were facing and submitted a request at his office for him to make efforts on our behalf to the Abuse Commission, the Legal Commission, and the Defense Commission in Parliament. He assured me that he would do this.

Today, a year and two months after this meeting, I have received no response, even though I have requested this in writing three times.

Over the phone and verbally at the F.C.E.R. (Federation of Jewish Communities of Romania), headquarters, Mr. Vexler, in an arrogant and mocking tone, told me that these efforts could not be made officially and that there were no registration numbers for the three cases I submitted to the three commissions. He also stated that my problem was not within the F.C.E.R.’s (Federation of Jewish Communities in Romania) competence. I won’t even speak of the rude, disrespectful, and insulting behavior of the security guards at F.C.E.R., who, since I submitted these requests, have been abusive. During my last visit to F.C.E.R., even in the presence of Mr. Vexler, the guards verbally assaulted us and denied us entry, even though Mr. Vexler himself was present, who claimed it was not his problem that the security (paid with our contributions) was preventing us from entering the F.C.E.R. building. Of course, I ask, why is this organization still called the Community of Jews, as it has nothing to do with its members?

I mention that our family also made requests to the C.N.C.D. (National Council for Fight against Discrimination), where we found that, according to Gheorghiu Luminita, such manifestations, abuses, and violations of the law are merely a way in which people can freely express their opinions!

Of course, I wonder

The Pogrom of Violinist Alexandru Tomescu Continues

We return with an update: the answer is yes!

On February 8, 2016, Ambassador of Goodwill, Alexandru Tomescu, through the Enforcement Agent Paula Somildoc, will sell a two-room apartment on the top floor for the modest sum of 15,000 euros (I will write it in words so that no one thinks it is a mistake: fifteen thousand euros).

The auction has already taken place, with Alexandru Tomescu being the only participant in this rigged auction!

As stated in court by the law firm Stoica and Associates, “…law firm, “…our client can no longer wait, he needs the money…” despite the fact that Alexandru Tomescu is not the holder of this debt but rather the bank from which he purchased the debt specifically for this purpose – Banca Transilvania (BTR), a bank that has never attempted to sell this apartment for such a modest sum. Not to mention that he bought this debt for 7,500 euros, in order to enforce it for 15,000 euros with an interest rate of 38%. A true AMBASSADOR OF GOODWILL!

With a simple internet search, I noticed that it is a modus operandi for Ambassador Tomescu Alexandru to participate alone in auctions, contests, etc. In the same way, he obtained the Stradivarius violin after a competition where he was the only participant, as evidenced by this material:

Update – February 17, 2016:

Today, on February 17, 2016, the Bucharest Sector 1 Court of First Instance accepted our action against the ordinances of the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Bucharest Sector 1 Court, I quote:

Short solution: Based on art. 341 para. (6) letter b of the Criminal Procedure Code, the complaint filed by petitioner MOLDOVEANU NICOLAE is admitted. The classification decision issued by the Ordinance No. 14008/P/2013 of July 23, 2015 and maintained by Ordinance No. 2083/ll-2/2015 of September 14, 2015 of the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Bucharest Sector 1 Court is annulled. The case is sent back to the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Bucharest Sector 1 Court for the completion of the criminal investigation regarding the commission of the offenses provided by art. 193 para. (2) of Law No. 123/2012, with the application of art. 5 of the Criminal Code and art. 228-229 para. (3) of the Criminal Code, with the application of art. 5 of the Criminal Code, with the application of art. 38 of the Criminal Code.

Based on art. 276 para. (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the request for judicial costs filed by the defendant Tomescu Alexandru is rejected as unfounded. Based on art. 275 para. (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the judicial costs remain the responsibility of the State. The decision is final. Pronounced in a council chamber session, today, February 17, 2016.

Document: Final Decision (discontinuation) February 17, 2016

The action involves defendant Tomescu Alexandru, who is being investigated for illegal gas connection, theft, and aggravated theft of gas from the address Grigore Cobalcescu Street No. 13, from which he intends to forcibly evict Mrs. Iancu Jeny and her family.

In practice, the apartment on the ground floor, owned by Tomescu Alexandru, was illegally connected to our gas pipeline located on the upper floor, without any authorization, contract, or our agreement, as required by law.

The Decision of the Bucharest Sector 1 Court Regarding the Illegal Gas Connection of Alexandru Tomescu to Our Gas Pipeline Was Taken Over by the Puterea Newspaper:

You may show your support for this cause here

You may show your support on this support group as well

alexandru tomescu
cauza

You may also show your support on this support group:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/736709933126476/

group
grup sustinere

this case is also the subject of an investigation made by Puterea newspaper:

puterea online tomescu

http://www.puterea24.ro/social/ambasadorul-bunavointei-violonistul-alexandru-tomescu-a-declansat-razboiul-imobiliar-cu-tenta-antisemita-128959.html

the first article published in Criteriul National newspaper of 27.07.20176

the second article published in Criteriul National newspaper of 17.03.2017

https://www.criteriul.ro/progromul-impotriva-domnului-nicolae-moldoveanu-si-a-mamei-domniei-sale-continua/

and in the daily Flux24.ro, article of 03.04.2017

Investigation by Mr. Adrian Radu, former SRI officer, published in the newspaper Incisiv de Prahova on 26.04.2017:

To these crimes, the company RCS-RDS also contributed, as they installed in my office a modified modem with unlimited traffic to SRI (Romanian Intelligence Service) and DNA (National Anticorruption Directorate).

I notified RCS-RDS both by phone and in writing, but the company does not acknowledge the presence of an RDS team at my office, which arrived in an RDS-branded vehicle to carry out a so-called “upgrade.”

 

Rds

 

Based on the mentioned article, the text indicates that Alexandru Tomescu is a member of Freemasonry in the Grand National Lodge of Romania (Marea Lojă Națională din România – MLNR).“In 2021, at Grigore Cobalcescu Street No. 13, based on a loan-for-use (comodate) contract, Alexandru Tomescu offered the house to the Magic Home Foundation, a foundation whose founder is the former Minister of Health, Vlad Voiculescu.”

http://jurnalul.ro/stire-special/aniversarea-masoneriei-albastre-in-epoca-flacarii-violet-533604.html

Article in Israel 411 media channel

for romanian version click here

Termeni si conditii

The Pogrom and the dark side of the GOODWILL Ambassador violonist Alexandru Tomescu